» Articles » PMID: 22484179

Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic and Non-cancerous Pain

Overview
Journal J Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2012 Apr 10
PMID 22484179
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: Chronic neuropathic pain is one of the most prevalent and debilitating disorders. Conventional medical management, however, remains frustrating for both patients and clinicians owing to poor specificity of pharmacotherapy, delayed onset of analgesia and extensive side effects. Neuromodulation presents as a promising alternative, or at least an adjunct, as it is more specific in inducing analgesia without associated risks of pharmacotherapy. Here, we discuss common clinical and investigational methods of neuromodulation. Compared to clinical spinal cord stimulation (SCS), investigational techniques of cerebral neuromodulation, both invasive (deep brain stimulation [DBS] and motor cortical stimulation [MCS]) and noninvasive (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [rTMS] and transcranial direct current stimulation [tDCS]), may be more advantageous. By adaptively targeting the multidimensional experience of pain, subtended by integrative pain circuitry in the brain, including somatosensory and thalamocortical, limbic and cognitive, cerebral methods may modulate the sensory-discriminative, affective-emotional and evaluative-cognitive spheres of the pain neuromatrix. Despite promise, the current state of results alludes to the possibility that cerebral neuromodulation has thus far not been effective in producing analgesia as intended in patients with chronic pain disorders. These techniques, thus, remain investigational and off-label. We discuss issues implicated in inadequate efficacy, variability of responsiveness, and poor retention of benefit, while recommending design and conceptual refinements for future trials of cerebral neuromodulation in management of chronic neuropathic pain.

Perspective: This critical review focuses on factors contributing to poor therapeutic utility of invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and pain of noncancerous origin. Through key clinical trial design and conceptual refinements, retention and consistency of response may be improved, potentially facilitating the widespread clinical applicability of such approaches.

Citing Articles

Glaucoma Rehabilitation Using ElectricAI Transcranial Stimulation (GREAT)-Optimizing Stimulation Protocol for Vision Enhancement Using an RCT.

Mei X, Tsang L, Jacques T, Sabel B, Leung C, Chan J Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(9):25.

PMID: 39302646 PMC: 11421665. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.9.25.


The combined effect of neuro-modulation and neuro-stimulation on pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy - a double-blinded, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial.

Sharma N, Bansal S, Dube O, Kaur S, Kumar P, Kapoor G J Spinal Cord Med. 2024; 48(2):221-231.

PMID: 38241510 PMC: 11864000. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2293328.


Pain nursing for gynecologic cancer patients.

Wu W, He X, Li S, Jin M, Ni Y Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1205553.

PMID: 37564934 PMC: 10410261. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1205553.


Inconsistencies in mapping current distribution in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Jwa A, Goodman J, Glover G Front Neuroimaging. 2023; 1:1069500.

PMID: 37555148 PMC: 10406311. DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.1069500.


Applications for oral research in microgravity - lessons learned from burning mouth syndrome and ageing studies.

Dugan C, Parlatescu I, Popescu B, Pop C, Marin M, Dinculescu A J Med Life. 2023; 16(3):381-386.

PMID: 37168310 PMC: 10165527. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0285.


References
1.
Boggio P, Zaghi S, Fregni F . Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychologia. 2008; 47(1):212-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.022. View

2.
Lefaucheur J, Drouot X, Menard-Lefaucheur I, Zerah F, Bendib B, Cesaro P . Neurogenic pain relief by repetitive transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation depends on the origin and the site of pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75(4):612-6. PMC: 1739005. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.022236. View

3.
Nguyen J, Keravel Y, Feve A, Uchiyama T, Cesaro P, Le Guerinel C . Treatment of deafferentation pain by chronic stimulation of the motor cortex: report of a series of 20 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1997; 68:54-60. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6513-3_10. View

4.
Andre-Obadia N, Peyron R, Mertens P, Mauguiere F, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L . Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control. Double-blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 117(7):1536-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.025. View

5.
Malone Jr D, Dougherty D, Rezai A, Carpenter L, Friehs G, Eskandar E . Deep brain stimulation of the ventral capsule/ventral striatum for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2008; 65(4):267-75. PMC: 3486635. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.08.029. View