» Articles » PMID: 10589873

Racing Cyclist Power Requirements in the 4000-m Individual and Team Pursuits

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1999 Dec 10
PMID 10589873
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is: 1) to present field test data describing the power requirements of internationally competitive individual and team pursuiters, and 2) to develop a theoretical model for pursuit power based upon on these tests.

Methods: In preparing U.S. cycling's pursuit team for the 1996 Atlanta Olympics, U.S. team scientists measured cycling power of seven subjects on the Atlanta track using a crank dynamometer (SRM) at speeds from 57 to 60 kph. By using these field data and other tests, mathematical models were devised which predict both individual and team pursuit performance. The field data indicate the power within a pace line at 60 kph averages 607 W in lead position (100%), 430 W in second position (70.8%), 389 W in third position (64.1%), and 389 W in fourth position (64.0%). A team member requires about 75% of the energy necessary for cyclists riding alone at the same speed. These results compare well with field measurements from a British pursuit team, to recent wind tunnel tests, and to earlier bicycle coast down tests.

Results: The theoretical models predict performance with reasonable accuracy when the average power potential of an individual or team is known, or they may be used to estimate the power of pursuit competitors knowing race times. The model estimates that Christopher Boardman averaged about 520 W when setting his 1996, 4000-m individual pursuit record of 4 min 11.114 s and the Italian 4000-m pursuit team averaged about 480 W in setting their record of 4:00.958. Both used the "Superman" cycling position.

Conclusions: These records would be very difficult to break using less aerodynamic riding positions, due to the extraordinarily high power requirements.

Citing Articles

Individualized optimal strategy in team pursuit for track cycling.

Boillet A, Noble M, Sachet I, Messonnier L, Cohen C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25308.

PMID: 39455723 PMC: 11512064. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75963-4.


Be Aware of the Benefits of Drafting in Sports and Take Your Advantage: A Meta-Analysis.

van den Brandt F, Khudair M, Hettinga F, Elferink-Gemser M Transl Sports Med. 2024; 2023:3254847.

PMID: 38654910 PMC: 11022785. DOI: 10.1155/2023/3254847.


Power-duration relationship comparison in competition sprint cyclists from 1-s to 20-min. Sprint performance is more than just peak power.

Ferguson H, Harnish C, Klich S, Michalik K, Dunst A, Zhou T PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0280658.

PMID: 37235558 PMC: 10218722. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280658.


Testing, Training, and Optimising Performance of Track Cyclists: A Systematic Mapping Review.

Stadnyk A, Impellizzeri F, Stanley J, Menaspa P, Slattery K Sports Med. 2021; 52(2):391-401.

PMID: 34591266 PMC: 8803767. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01565-z.


Steady hydrodynamic interaction between human swimmers.

Yuan Z, Li M, Ji C, Li L, Jia L, Incecik A J R Soc Interface. 2019; 16(150):20180768.

PMID: 30958151 PMC: 6364631. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0768.