Pharmacological Similarities Between Native Brain and Heterologously Expressed Alpha4beta2 Nicotinic Receptors
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
1 We studied the pharmacological properties of native rat brain and heterologously expressed rat alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptors immunoprecipitated onto a fixed substrate with the anti-alpha4 antibody mAb 299. 2 Immunodepletion with the anti-beta2 antibody mAb 270 showed that 89% of the mAb-299-precipitated rat brain receptors contained beta2. 3 The association and dissociation rate constants for 30 pM +/-[3H]-epibatidine binding to alpha4beta2 receptors expressed in oocytes were 0.02+/-0.01 and 0.03+/-0.01 min-1 (+/-standard error, degrees of freedom=7 - 8) at 20 - 23 degrees C. 4 The Hill coefficients for +/-[3H]epibatidine binding to the native brain, alpha4beta2 receptors expressed in oocytes, and alpha4beta2 receptors expressed in CV-1 cells (using recombinant adenovirus) were 0.69 - 0.70 suggesting a heterogeneous receptor population. Fits of the +/-[3H]-epibatidine concentration-binding data to a two-site model gave KD s of 8 - 30 and 560 - 1,200 pM. The high-affinity sites comprised 73 - 74% of the native brain and oocyte alpha4beta2 receptor population, 85% of the CV-1 alpha4beta2 receptor population. 5 The expression of rat alpha4beta2 receptors in CV-1 cells using vaccinia viral infection-transfection resulted in a more homogeneous receptor population (Hill coefficient of 1. 0+/-0.2). Fits of the +/-[3H]-epibatidine binding data to a single-site model gave a KD of 40+/-3 pM. 6 DHbetaE (IC50=260-470 nM) and the novel nicotine analogue NDNI (IC50=7-10 microM) inhibited 30 pM+/-[3H]-epibatidine binding to the native brain and heterologously expressed alpha4beta2 receptors equally well. 7 The results show that alpha4beta2-containing nicotinic receptors in the rat brain and heterologously expressed rat alpha4beta2 receptors have similar affinities for +/-[3H]-epibatidine, DHbetaE, and NDNI.
Stoichiometry of the Heteromeric Nicotinic Receptors of the Renshaw Cell.
Lamotte dIncamps B, Zorbaz T, Dingova D, Krejci E, Ascher P J Neurosci. 2018; 38(21):4943-4956.
PMID: 29724797 PMC: 6596121. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0070-18.2018.
Govind A, Vallejo Y, Stolz J, Yan J, Swanson G, Green W Elife. 2017; 6.
PMID: 28718768 PMC: 5546804. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.25651.
Indurthi D, Pera E, Kim H, Chu C, McLeod M, McIntosh J Biochem Pharmacol. 2014; 89(1):131-40.
PMID: 24548457 PMC: 5089836. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.02.002.
Person A, Wells G BMC Biophys. 2011; 4:19.
PMID: 22112852 PMC: 3287110. DOI: 10.1186/2046-1682-4-19.
Unraveling the high- and low-sensitivity agonist responses of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
Harpsoe K, Ahring P, Christensen J, Jensen M, Peters D, Balle T J Neurosci. 2011; 31(30):10759-66.
PMID: 21795528 PMC: 6623092. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1509-11.2011.