» Articles » PMID: 10551229

Prostate Cancer: Localization with Three-dimensional Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging--clinicopathologic Study

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 1999 Nov 7
PMID 10551229
Citations 126
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of combined magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and three-dimensional (3D) proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer.

Materials And Methods: MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging examinations were performed in 53 patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer and subsequent radical prostatectomy with step-section histopathologic examination. The prostate was divided into sextants. At MR imaging, the presence or absence of cancer in the peripheral zone of each sextant was assessed independently by two readers (readers 1 and 2) unaware of the findings at 3D MR spectroscopic imaging and histopathologic examination. At 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, cancer was diagnosed as possible if the ratio of choline plus creatine to citrate exceeded 2 SD above population norms or as definite if that ratio exceeded 3 SDs above the norm.

Results: On the basis of sextants, sensitivity and specificity, respectively, for MR imaging were 77% and 61% (reader 1) and 81% and 46% (reader 2) with moderate interreader agreement (kappa = 0.43). The 3D MR spectroscopic imaging diagnosis of definite cancer had significantly higher specificity (75%, P < .05) but lower sensitivity (63%, P < .05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed significantly (P < .001) improved tumor localization for both readers when 3D MR spectroscopic imaging was added to MR imaging. High specificity (up to 91%) was obtained when combined MR imaging and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging indicated cancer, whereas high sensitivity (up to 95%) was obtained when either test alone indicated a positive result.

Conclusion: The addition of 3D MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging provides better detection and localization of prostate cancer in a sextant of the prostate than does use of MR imaging alone.

Citing Articles

Genitourinary Imaging in 2040.

Goh V Radiology. 2023; 307(5):e230223.

PMID: 37249430 PMC: 10315527. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230223.


Prediction of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: assessment of prognostic factors on pretreatment imaging.

Asuncion A, Walker P, Bertaut A, Blanc J, Labarre M, Martin E Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(12):5309-5325.

PMID: 36465820 PMC: 9703104. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-184.


Direct correlation of MRI with histopathology in pediatric renal tumors through the use of a patient-specific 3-D-printed cutting guide: a feasibility study.

van der Beek J, Fitski M, de Krijger R, Wijnen M, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, Vermeulen M Pediatr Radiol. 2022; 53(2):235-243.

PMID: 36040524 PMC: 9892092. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05476-7.


Dictionary learning compressed sensing reconstruction: pilot validation of accelerated echo planar J-resolved spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer.

Joy A, Nagarajan R, Saucedo A, Iqbal Z, Sarma M, Wilson N MAGMA. 2022; 35(4):667-682.

PMID: 35869359 PMC: 9363346. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01029-z.


A Phase 2/3 Prospective Multicenter Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT with F-DCFPyL in Prostate Cancer Patients (OSPREY).

Pienta K, Gorin M, Rowe S, Carroll P, Pouliot F, Probst S J Urol. 2021; 206(1):52-61.

PMID: 33634707 PMC: 8556578. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001698.