Electrocardiographic Changes in 1000 Highly Trained Junior Elite Athletes
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To evaluate the spectrum of electrocardiographic (ECG) changes in 1000 junior (18 or under) elite athletes.
Methods: A total of 1000 (73% male) junior elite athletes (mean (SD) age 15.7 (1.4) years (range 14-18); mean (SD) body surface area 1.73 (0.17) m2 (range 1.09-2.25)) and 300 non-athletic controls matched for gender, age, and body surface area had a 12 lead ECG examination.
Results: Athletes had a significantly higher prevalence of sinus bradycardia (80% v 19%; p<0.0001) and sinus arrhythmia (52% v 9%; p<0.0001) than non-athletes. The PR interval, QRS, and QT duration were more prolonged in athletes than non-athletes (153 (20) v 140 (18) milliseconds (p<0.0001), 92 (12) v 89 (7) milliseconds (p<0.0001), and 391 (27) v 379 (29) milliseconds (p = 0.002) respectively). The Sokolow voltage criterion for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and the Romhilt-Estes points score for LVH was more common in athletes (45% v 23% (p<0.0001) and 10% v 0% (p<0.0001) respectively), as were criteria for left and right atrial enlargement (14% v 1.2% and 16% v 2% respectively). None of the athletes with voltage criteria for LVH had left axis deviation, ST segment depression, deep T wave inversion, or pathological Q waves. ST segment elevation was more common in athletes than non-athletes (43% v 24%; p<0.0001). Minor T wave inversion (less than -0.2 mV) in V2 and V3 was present in 4% of athletes and non-athletes. Minor T wave inversion elsewhere was absent in non-athletes and present in 0.4% of athletes.
Conclusions: ECG changes in junior elite athletes are not dissimilar to those in senior athletes. Isolated Sokolow voltage criterion for LVH is common; however, associated abnormalities that indicate pathological hypertrophy are absent. Minor T wave inversions in leads other than V2 and V3 may be present in athletes and non-athletes less than 16 but should be an indication for further investigation in older athletes.
Physiology and Pathophysiology of Marathon Running: A narrative Review.
Braschler L, Nikolaidis P, Thuany M, Chlibkova D, Rosemann T, Weiss K Sports Med Open. 2025; 11(1):10.
PMID: 39871014 PMC: 11772678. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-025-00810-3.
Asztalos I, Artis A, Zavez A, Vetter V J Electrocardiol. 2024; 87:153810.
PMID: 39442283 PMC: 11620916. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153810.
Malmgren A, Tragardh E, Gudmundsson P, Kjellstrom B, Stagmo M, Dencker M Front Sports Act Living. 2024; 6:1384483.
PMID: 38737439 PMC: 11084279. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1384483.
Exercise-induced QTc prolongation and implications for military service members: A case series.
Pagani A, Hellwig L, Dobson C, Hughes B, Schacht J, Haigney M HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023; 9(10):759-763.
PMID: 38047202 PMC: 10691940. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.07.023.
Comparison of methods for correcting QT interval in athletes and young people: A systematic review.
Mahendran S, Gupta I, Davis J, Davis A, Orchard J, Orchard J Clin Cardiol. 2023; 46(9):1106-1115.
PMID: 37470093 PMC: 10540007. DOI: 10.1002/clc.24093.