» Articles » PMID: 10485887

Modeling Evolutionary Landscapes: Mutational Stability, Topology, and Superfunnels in Sequence Space

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1999 Sep 15
PMID 10485887
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Random mutations under neutral or near-neutral conditions are studied by considering plausible evolutionary trajectories on "neutral nets"-i.e., collections of sequences (genotypes) interconnected via single-point mutations encoding for the same ground-state structure (phenotype). We use simple exact lattice models for the mapping between sequence and conformational spaces. Densities of states based on model intrachain interactions are determined by exhaustive conformational enumeration. We compare results from two very different interaction schemes to ascertain robustness of the conclusions. In both models, sequences in a majority of neutral nets center around a single "prototype sequence" of maximum mutational stability, tolerating the largest number of neutral mutations. General analytical considerations show that these topologies by themselves lead to higher steady-state evolutionary populations at prototype sequences. On average, native thermodynamic stability increases toward a maximum at the prototype sequence, resulting in funnel-like arrangements of native stabilities in sequence space. These observations offer a unified perspective on sequence design, native stability, and mutational stability of proteins. These principles are generalizable from native stability to any measure of fitness provided that its variation with respect to mutations is essentially smooth.

Citing Articles

Modeling Length Changes in De Novo Open Reading Frames during Neutral Evolution.

Lebherz M, Ravi Iyengar B, Bornberg-Bauer E Genome Biol Evol. 2024; 16(7).

PMID: 38879874 PMC: 11339603. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evae129.


A shark-inspired general model of tooth morphogenesis unveils developmental asymmetries in phenotype transitions.

Zimm R, Berio F, Debiais-Thibaud M, Goudemand N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(15):e2216959120.

PMID: 37027430 PMC: 10104537. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2216959120.


Conflicting effects of recombination on the evolvability and robustness in neutrally evolving populations.

Klug A, Krug J PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(11):e1010710.

PMID: 36409763 PMC: 9721492. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010710.


A Method for Assessing the Robustness of Protein Structures by Randomizing Packing Interactions.

Yadahalli S, Jayanthi L, Gosavi S Front Mol Biosci. 2022; 9:849272.

PMID: 35832734 PMC: 9271847. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.849272.


Ancestral sequences of a large promiscuous enzyme family correspond to bridges in sequence space in a network representation.

Buchholz P, van Loo B, Eenink B, Bornberg-Bauer E, Pleiss J J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(184):20210389.

PMID: 34727710 PMC: 8564622. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0389.


References
1.
Ebeling M, Nadler W . Protein folding: optimized sequences obtained by simulated breeding in a minimalist model. Biopolymers. 1997; 41(2):165-80. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(199702)41:2<165::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-R. View

2.
Lau K, Dill K . Theory for protein mutability and biogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990; 87(2):638-42. PMC: 53320. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.638. View

3.
Fontana W, Schuster P . A computer model of evolutionary optimization. Biophys Chem. 1987; 26(2-3):123-47. DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(87)80017-0. View

4.
Nelson E, Onuchic J . Proposed mechanism for stability of proteins to evolutionary mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95(18):10682-6. PMC: 27955. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10682. View

5.
Govindarajan S, Goldstein R . The foldability landscape of model proteins. Biopolymers. 1997; 42(4):427-38. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(19971005)42:4<427::AID-BIP6>3.0.CO;2-S. View