Background:
The purpose of this study was to examine the diagnostic efficiency of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) testing when using either 4.0 ng/ml or an age-specific reference range (ASRR) as an abnormal cutoff PSA value.
Methods:
Between 1992-1995, 116,073 men, aged 40-79 years, were screened during Prostate Cancer Awareness Week. When using a 4.0-ng/ml cutoff PSA value, 22,014 had either an abnormal PSA, an abnormal DRE, or both. When using an ASRR cutoff PSA value, 17,561 had either an abnormal PSA, an abnormal DRE, or both. The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of PSA, DRE, and combined PSA and DRE tests were evaluated.
Results:
When using a 4.0-ng/ml cutoff PSA value, the PPVs of abnormal PSA alone, abnormal DRE alone, and combined abnormal PSA and DRE tests were 27.7%, 17.7%, and 56.0%, respectively. Sensitivities were 34.9%, 27.1%, and 38.0%, respectively. Specificities were 63.1%, 49.0%, and 87.9%, respectively. When using an ASRR cutoff PSA value, the PPVs of each category were 31.8%, 20.8%, and 63.7%, respectively. Sensitivities were 27.1%, 41.0%, and 31.8%, respectively. Specificities were 75.0%, 32.8%, and 92.2%, respectively. The PPVs of the PSA test were higher than those of the DRE. The PPVs of combined tests were highest when using either a 4.0-ng/ml cutoff PSA value or an ASRR cutoff PSA value (all P < 0.001). When using an ASRR, the PPVs of PSA, DRE, and combined tests were higher than those when using a 4.0-ng/ml without statistical significance (all P > 0.05). Sensitivity of PSA when using an ASRR was lower than when using 4.0 ng/ml.
Conclusions:
Significantly higher PPVs indicated that utilizing both a PSA test and a DRE is most effective in screening for the early detection of prostate cancer. Although higher PPVs when using an ASRR cutoff PSA value suggested fewer unnecessary biopsies, lower sensitivities resulted in fewer cancers detected. Thus, we recommend that the combination of a PSA test with a cutoff value of 4.0 ng/ml and a DRE should continue to be utilized in the screening programs.
Citing Articles
A cost-benefit analysis of mass prostate cancer screening.
Farabi H, Moradi N, Ahmadzadeh A, Aghamir S, Mohammadi A, Rezapour A
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024; 22(1):37.
PMID: 38705990
PMC: 11071254.
DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00553-0.
Use of Sensor Array Analysis to Detect Ovarian Cancer through Breath, Urine, and Blood: A Case-Control Study.
Angioli R, Santonico M, Pennazza G, Montera R, Luvero D, Gatti A
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(5).
PMID: 38473033
PMC: 10930654.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14050561.
Value of digital rectal examination in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective cohort analysis study.
Ying Y, He W, Xiong Q, Wang Z, Wang M, Chen Q
Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(11):1666-1672.
PMID: 38106690
PMC: 10719765.
DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-371.
Multiplexed Prostate Cancer Companion Diagnostic Devices.
Aidoo-Brown J, Moschou D, Estrela P
Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(15).
PMID: 34372259
PMC: 8347987.
DOI: 10.3390/s21155023.
Prostate Cancer Screening in Brazil: a single center experience in the public health system.
de Oliveira R, Guimaraes G, Mourao T, Favaretto R, Santana T, Lopes A
Int Braz J Urol. 2021; 47(3):558-565.
PMID: 33621004
PMC: 7993978.
DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0392.
Fully Automated, Label-Free Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Whole Blood for Cancer Diagnosis and Monitoring.
Sunkara V, Kim C, Park J, Woo H, Kim D, Ha H
Theranostics. 2019; 9(7):1851-1863.
PMID: 31037143
PMC: 6485293.
DOI: 10.7150/thno.32438.
Development and Validation of a Multiparameterized Artificial Neural Network for Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction and Stratification.
Roffman D, Hart G, Leapman M, Yu J, Guo F, Ali I
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019; 2:1-10.
PMID: 30652591
PMC: 6873987.
DOI: 10.1200/CCI.17.00119.
Automated 3D-Printed Microfluidic Array for Rapid Nanomaterial-Enhanced Detection of Multiple Proteins.
Kadimisetty K, Malla S, Bhalerao K, Mosa I, Bhakta S, Lee N
Anal Chem. 2018; 90(12):7569-7577.
PMID: 29779368
PMC: 6104517.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01198.
Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Naji L, Randhawa H, Sohani Z, Dennis B, Lautenbach D, Kavanagh O
Ann Fam Med. 2018; 16(2):149-154.
PMID: 29531107
PMC: 5847354.
DOI: 10.1370/afm.2205.
Prostate Cancer Screening.
Catalona W
Med Clin North Am. 2018; 102(2):199-214.
PMID: 29406053
PMC: 5935113.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.11.001.
The role of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level and an abnormal digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study in Qatar.
Rumaihi K, Al Jalham K, Younes N, Majzoub A, Shokeir A
Arab J Urol. 2015; 11(4):355-60.
PMID: 26558105
PMC: 4442974.
DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.014.
Modeling Disease Progression with Longitudinal Markers.
Inoue L, Etzioni R, Morrell C, Muller P
J Am Stat Assoc. 2014; 103(481):259-270.
PMID: 24453387
PMC: 3896511.
DOI: 10.1198/016214507000000356.
Clinico-pathological Correlation of Digital Rectal Examination Findings Amongst Nigerian Men with Prostatic Diseases: A Prospective Study of 236 Cases.
Ojewola R, Jeje E, Tijani K, Ogunjimi M, Anunobi C
Niger J Surg. 2013; 19(1):26-31.
PMID: 24027415
PMC: 3762036.
DOI: 10.4103/1117-6806.111506.
[Parameters to improve the specificity of the prostate-specific antigen. Early detection of prostate cancer].
Borgermann C, Kliner S, Swoboda A, Luboldt H, Rubben H
Urologe A. 2011; 50(9):1095-100.
PMID: 21567277
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2577-8.
[-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study.
Le B, Griffin C, Loeb S, Carvalhal G, Kan D, Baumann N
J Urol. 2010; 183(4):1355-9.
PMID: 20171670
PMC: 3537165.
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.056.
Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.
Shariat S, Karam J, Lotan Y, Karakiewizc P
Rev Urol. 2008; 10(2):120-35.
PMID: 18660854
PMC: 2483317.
Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M, Sinan T, Kehinde E, Hussein A, Anim J, Al-Hunayan A
Ann Saudi Med. 2007; 27(2):73-8.
PMID: 17356323
PMC: 6077036.
DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2007.73.
Screening for prostate cancer.
Gambert S
Int Urol Nephrol. 2002; 33(2):249-57.
PMID: 12092637
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015290429403.