» Articles » PMID: 20171670

[-2]Proenzyme Prostate Specific Antigen is More Accurate Than Total and Free Prostate Specific Antigen in Differentiating Prostate Cancer from Benign Disease in a Prospective Prostate Cancer Screening Study

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2010 Feb 23
PMID 20171670
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Due to the limited specificity of prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer screening, there is an ongoing search for adjunctive biomarkers. Retrospective studies have suggested that an isoform of proenzyme prostate specific antigen called [-2]proenzyme prostate specific antigen may enhance the specificity of prostate specific antigen based screening. We examined the usefulness of this isoform in a prospective prostate cancer screening study.

Materials And Methods: From a population of 2,034 men undergoing prostate cancer screening we examined the relationship between the measurement of the [-2]isoform of proenzyme prostate specific antigen (p2PSA) and prostate cancer detection. Specifically we compared the usefulness of total prostate specific antigen, the ratio of free-to-total prostate specific antigen, the ratio of p2PSA-to-free prostate specific antigen, and a formula combining prostate specific antigen, free prostate specific antigen and p2PSA (the Beckman Coulter prostate health index or phi) to predict prostate cancer in men from the study undergoing prostate biopsy with a prostate specific antigen of 2.5 to 10 ng/ml and nonsuspicious digital rectal examination.

Results: Despite similar total prostate specific antigen (p = 0.88), percent free prostate specific antigen (p = 0.02) and %p2PSA (p = 0.0006) distinguished between positive and negative biopsy results. On ROC analysis %p2PSA (AUC 0.76) outperformed prostate specific antigen (AUC 0.50) and percent free prostate specific antigen (AUC 0.68) for differentiating between prostate cancer and benign disease. Setting the sensitivity at 88.5%, p2PSA led to a substantial improvement in specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values. The Beckman Coulter prostate health index (AUC 0.77) had the best overall performance characteristics.

Conclusions: This is the first prospective study to our knowledge to demonstrate that p2PSA provides improved discrimination between prostate cancer and benign disease in screened men with a prostate specific antigen of 2.5 to 10 ng/ml and a negative digital rectal examination.

Citing Articles

Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review.

Agbetuyi-Tayo P, Gbadebo M, Rotimi O, Rotimi S Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241290029.

PMID: 39440372 PMC: 11497500. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241290029.


Associations of HALP score with serum prostate-specific antigen and mortality in middle-aged and elderly individuals without prostate cancer.

Chen Z, Zhang Y, Dan M, Hong X, Chen S, Zhong X Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1419310.

PMID: 39372874 PMC: 11449680. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1419310.


Evaluating the Role of Morphological Parameters in the Prostate Transition Zone in PHI-Based Predictive Models for Detecting Gray Zone Prostate Cancer.

Qian Y, Shi Y, Sheng X, Liao H, Chen H, Shi B Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023; 17:11795549231201122.

PMID: 37869472 PMC: 10588416. DOI: 10.1177/11795549231201122.


Re-evaluating the diagnostic efficacy of PSA as a referral test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in contemporary MRI-based image-guided biopsy pathways.

Lophatananon A, Light A, Burns-Cox N, Maccormick A, John J, Otti V J Clin Urol. 2023; 16(4):264-273.

PMID: 37614642 PMC: 7614972. DOI: 10.1177/20514158211059057.


References
1.
de Vries S, Raaijmakers R, Blijenberg B, Mikolajczyk S, Rittenhouse H, Schroder F . Additional use of [-2] precursor prostate-specific antigen and "benign" PSA at diagnosis in screen-detected prostate cancer. Urology. 2005; 65(5):926-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.030. View

2.
Andriole G, Crawford E, Grubb 3rd R, Buys S, Chia D, Church T . Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13):1310-9. PMC: 2944770. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. View

3.
Catalona W, Partin A, Slawin K, Brawer M, Flanigan R, Patel A . Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA. 1998; 279(19):1542-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.279.19.1542. View

4.
Catalona W, Bartsch G, Rittenhouse H, Evans C, Linton H, Horninger W . Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen. J Urol. 2004; 171(6 Pt 1):2239-44. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000127737.94221.3e. View

5.
Mikolajczyk S, Millar L, Wang T, Rittenhouse H, Marks L, Song W . A precursor form of prostate-specific antigen is more highly elevated in prostate cancer compared with benign transition zone prostate tissue. Cancer Res. 2000; 60(3):756-9. View