Biochemical Markers Can Predict the Response in Bone Mass During Alendronate Treatment in Early Postmenopausal Women. Alendronate Osteoporosis Prevention Study Group
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Data from the Danish cohort (n = 67) of a multicenter trial of oral alendronate in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis were used to evaluate the capacity of the biochemical markers to predict changes in bone mineral density (BMD). A panel of markers were measured: serum N-terminal midfragment osteocalcin (N-MID OC); serum total osteocalcin (total OC); bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP); serum and urine C-telopeptides of type I collagen (sCL and uCL); urine N-telopeptide crosslinks of type I collagen (NTX); and deoxypyridinoline (dPyr). The correlation between change from baseline at months 3-12 in total OC, N-MID OC, sCL, uCL, and NTX and 2 year response in spine BMD ranged from r = -0.45 to r = -0.78 (p < 0.001), and from r = -0.38 to r = 0.10 (n.s. to p < 0.002) for BSAP and dPyr. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the accuracy of change from baseline at month 6 in the biochemical markers for predicting prevention of bone loss in the spine over 2 years. The cutpoints used were a 30% (N-MID OC) or 50% (all other markers) decrease from baseline. Sensitivity levels were 82% (N-MID OC), 98% (total OC), 78% (sCL and NTX), and 89% (uCL). Specificities were 91% (N-MID OC), 59% (total OC), 100% (sCL), 71% (uCL), and 84% (NTX). Positive predictive values were 95% (N-MID OC), 82% (total OC), 100% (sCL), 87% (uCL), and 90% (NTX). In comparison, the predictive capacities of change from baseline at year 2 in hip BMD in predicting prevention of bone loss at the spine were similar: sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 55%; and positive predictive value, 79%. In conclusion, short-term changes in biochemical markers were valid predictors of long-term changes in BMD. Short-term changes in the sensitive biochemical markers revealed a predictive capacity similar to bone densitometry at the hip measured over 2 years. The sensitive biochemical markers offered a fast and valid alternative to bone densitometry for monitoring of alendronate treatment.
Chen H, Zhang R, Li G, Yan K, Wu Z, Zhang Y Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1460906.
PMID: 39568587 PMC: 11577086. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1460906.
Chavassieux P, Roux J, Chapurlat R Osteoporos Int. 2023; 35(4):653-658.
PMID: 38129674 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06972-8.
Composition and Properties of Saliva in Patients with Osteoporosis Taking Antiresorptive Drugs.
Sobczak-Jaskow H, Kochanska B, Drogoszewska B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).
PMID: 36901300 PMC: 10002130. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054294.
Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.
McClung M Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021; 33(4):775-791.
PMID: 33594648 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01708-8.
A Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Osteocalcin in Human Serum and a Solution to the "Hook Effect".
Han S, Xue Y, Zhang J, Huang J, Liu X, Yang Y J Anal Methods Chem. 2020; 2020:8891437.
PMID: 33376621 PMC: 7744234. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8891437.