Timothy H Parker
Overview
Explore the profile of Timothy H Parker including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
17
Citations
982
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Gould E, Fraser H, Parker T, Nakagawa S, Griffith S, Vesk P, et al.
BMC Biol
. 2025 Feb;
23(1):35.
PMID: 39915771
Although variation in effect sizes and predicted values among studies of similar phenomena is inevitable, such variation far exceeds what might be produced by sampling error alone. One possible explanation...
2.
3.
Yang Y, Sanchez-Tojar A, ODea R, Noble D, Koricheva J, Jennions M, et al.
BMC Biol
. 2023 Apr;
21(1):71.
PMID: 37013585
Collaborative efforts to directly replicate empirical studies in the medical and social sciences have revealed alarmingly low rates of replicability, a phenomenon dubbed the 'replication crisis'. Poor replicability has spurred...
4.
Fraser H, Bush M, Wintle B, Mody F, Smith E, Hanea A, et al.
PLoS One
. 2023 Jan;
18(1):e0274429.
PMID: 36701303
As replications of individual studies are resource intensive, techniques for predicting the replicability are required. We introduce the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process, a new method for eliciting...
5.
Coles N, Hamlin J, Sullivan L, Parker T, Altschul D
Nature
. 2022 Jan;
601(7894):505-507.
PMID: 35079150
No abstract available.
6.
ODea R, Lagisz M, Jennions M, Koricheva J, Noble D, Parker T, et al.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc
. 2021 May;
96(5):1695-1722.
PMID: 33960637
Since the early 1990s, ecologists and evolutionary biologists have aggregated primary research using meta-analytic methods to understand ecological and evolutionary phenomena. Meta-analyses can resolve long-standing disputes, dispel spurious claims, and...
7.
ODea R, Parker T, Chee Y, Culina A, Drobniak S, Duncan D, et al.
BMC Biol
. 2021 Apr;
19(1):68.
PMID: 33836762
Unreliable research programmes waste funds, time, and even the lives of the organisms we seek to help and understand. Reducing this waste and increasing the value of scientific evidence require...
8.
Fraser H, Barnett A, Parker T, Fidler F
Ecol Evol
. 2020 Jul;
10(12):5197-5207.
PMID: 32607143
Recent large-scale projects in other disciplines have shown that results often fail to replicate when studies are repeated. The conditions contributing to this problem are also present in ecology, but...
9.
Benjamin D, Berger J, Johannesson M, Nosek B, Wagenmakers E, Berk R, et al.
Nat Hum Behav
. 2019 Apr;
2(1):6-10.
PMID: 30980045
No abstract available.
10.
Parker T, Griffith S, Bronstein J, Fidler F, Foster S, Fraser H, et al.
Nat Ecol Evol
. 2018 May;
2(6):929-935.
PMID: 29789547
Peer review is widely considered fundamental to maintaining the rigour of science, but it often fails to ensure transparency and reduce bias in published papers, and this systematically weakens the...