Stephen J Lupker
Overview
Explore the profile of Stephen J Lupker including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
68
Citations
535
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Fernandez-Lopez M, Lupker S, Gomez P, Labusch M, Davis C, Perea M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2025 Feb;
PMID: 39946589
Lupker and Davis (2009) introduced a modification of Forster and Davis's (1984) masked priming technique that increased the size of priming effects. The modification involved briefly presenting the target as...
2.
Li L, Yang H, Jia G, Spinelli G, Lupker S
J Psycholinguist Res
. 2024 Jun;
53(4):51.
PMID: 38913110
Previous research has demonstrated cognate translation priming effects in masked priming lexical decision tasks (LDTs) even when a bilingual's two languages have different scripts. Because those effect sizes are normally...
3.
Spinelli G, Lupker S
Atten Percept Psychophys
. 2024 May;
86(4):1259-1286.
PMID: 38691237
Conflict-induced control refers to humans' ability to regulate attention in the processing of target information (e.g., the color of a word in the color-word Stroop task) based on experience with...
4.
Lupker S, Spinelli G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2023 Sep;
49(11):1861-1880.
PMID: 37668567
Rastle et al. (2004) reported that true (e.g., walker) and pseudo (e.g., corner) multi-morphemic words prime their stem words more than form controls do (e.g., brothel priming BROTH) in a...
5.
Spinelli G, Lupker S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
. 2023 Jun;
:17470218231182854.
PMID: 37287129
In the Stroop task, the identities of the targets (e.g., colours) and distractors (e.g., words) used are often correlated. For example, in a list in which 4 words and 4...
6.
Liu C, Wanner-Kawahara J, Yoshihara M, Lupker S, Nakayama M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2023 Apr;
49(11):1823-1843.
PMID: 37053424
Previous masked translation priming studies, especially those with different-script bilinguals, have shown that cognates provide more priming than noncognates, a difference attributed to cognates' phonological similarity. In our experiments employing...
7.
Wanner-Kawahara J, Yoshihara M, Lupker S, Verdonschot R, Nakayama M
Front Psychol
. 2022 Aug;
13:742965.
PMID: 35967661
For native (L1) English readers, masked presentations of past-tense verb primes (e.g., fell and looked) produce faster lexical decision latencies to their present-tense targets (e.g., FALL and LOOK) than orthographically...
8.
Spinelli G, Lupker S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2022 Jul;
49(5):675-700.
PMID: 35787140
In the standard Proportion-Congruent (PC) paradigm, performance is compared between a list containing mostly congruent (MC) stimuli (e.g., the word RED in the color red in the Stroop task; Stroop,...
9.
Spinelli G, Morton J, Lupker S
Psychon Bull Rev
. 2022 Jun;
29(6):2133-2145.
PMID: 35768659
Adapting attention flexibly is a fundamental ability of the human control system. In the color-word Stroop task, for example, congruency effects are typically smaller for colors and words that appear...
10.
Spinelli G, Lupker S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
. 2022 Apr;
48(5):497-530.
PMID: 35389710
In interference tasks (e.g., Stroop, 1935), congruency effects are larger following a congruent versus an incongruent trial. This "congruency sequence effect" has been traditionally explained in terms of a conflict-monitoring...