» Authors » Sanne Lof

Sanne Lof

Explore the profile of Sanne Lof including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles. Areas
Snapshot
Articles 22
Citations 438
Followers 0
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Chen J, Lof S, Zwart M, Busch O, Daams F, Festen S, et al.
Ann Surg Open . 2023 Dec; 4(4):e354. PMID: 38144496
Background: A potential downside of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is the lack of tactile feedback when tying sutures, which could be especially perilous during pancreatic anastomosis. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine...
2.
van Bodegraven E, Lof S, Jones L, Aussilhou B, Yong G, Jishu W, et al.
Ann Surg . 2023 Dec; 280(6):993-998. PMID: 38073561
Objective: To develop a prediction model for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction after central pancreatectomy (CP) which could help in tailoring the use of this procedure. Background: CP is a...
3.
Korrel M, Jones L, van Hilst J, Balzano G, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, et al.
Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2023 Jul; 31:100673. PMID: 37457332
Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with...
4.
Lof S, Claassen L, Hannink G, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, et al.
JAMA Surg . 2023 Jun; 158(9):927-933. PMID: 37378968
Importance: Understanding the learning curve of a new complex surgical technique helps to reduce potential patient harm. Current series on the learning curve of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) are...
5.
Chen J, van Ramshorst T, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Bjornsson B, Boggi U, et al.
Ann Surg Oncol . 2023 Feb; 30(5):3023-3032. PMID: 36800127
Background: Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is increasingly used as an alternative to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer but comparative multicenter studies confirming the safety and...
6.
van Ramshorst T, Giani A, Mazzola M, Dokmak S, Fteriche F, Esposito A, et al.
Br J Surg . 2022 Nov; 110(1):76-83. PMID: 36322465
Background: Benchmarking is an important tool for quality comparison and improvement. However, no benchmark values are available for minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, either laparoscopically or robotically assisted. The aim...
7.
Korrel M, Lof S, Alseidi A, Asbun H, Boggi U, Hogg M, et al.
J Am Coll Surg . 2022 Aug; 235(3):383-390. PMID: 35972156
Background: Previous reports suggest that structured training in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) can ensure a safe implementation into standard practice. Although some training programs have been constructed, worldwide consensus...
8.
9.
van der Heijde N, Lof S, Busch O, de Hingh I, de Kleine R, Molenaar I, et al.
Surgery . 2021 Dec; 171(6):1658-1664. PMID: 34906371
Background: Previous studies reported a higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy compared to open distal pancreatectomy. It is unknown whether the clinical impact of postoperative...
10.
van Hilst J, Korrel M, Lof S, de Rooij T, Vissers F, Al-Sarireh B, et al.
Trials . 2021 Sep; 22(1):608. PMID: 34503548
Background: Recently, the first randomized trials comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for non-malignant and malignant disease showed a 2-day reduction in time to functional...