S M Archbold
Overview
Explore the profile of S M Archbold including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
14
Citations
100
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Sach T, Whynes D, Archbold S, ODonoghue G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
. 2005 May;
69(7):929-36.
PMID: 15911011
Objectives: The objectives of this study are to estimate time and out-of-pocket costs incurred by families attending a pediatric cochlear implant programme. In addition, qualitative data examine the intangible costs...
2.
Sach T, Whynes D, Parker P, Archbold S
J Health Organ Manag
. 2004 May;
18(1):53-63.
PMID: 15133884
This paper traces the innovative development of the Nottingham Cochlear Implant Programmes. The paediatric programme was the first to be established in the UK in 1989 and remains the largest...
3.
Sach T, Whynes D, ONeill C, ODonoghue G, Archbold S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
. 2003 Dec;
68(1):91-9.
PMID: 14687692
Objective: This paper presents the results of the first willingness-to-pay (WTP) study to be undertaken on cochlear implantation. It aims to measure the values parents place on the UK having...
4.
Sach T, ONeill C, Whynes D, Archbold S, ODonoghue G
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
. 2003 Jul;
19(2):421-31.
PMID: 12862198
Objectives: To examine the cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation over time. Methods: A prospective study based on ninety-eight children implanted between 1989 and 1996 at Nottingham's Paediatric Cochlear Implantation Programme,...
5.
ONeill C, ODonoghue G, Archbold S, Nikolopoulos T, Sach T
Otol Neurotol
. 2002 Jan;
23(1):44-8.
PMID: 11773845
Objective: To investigate variations in gains in auditory performance in children with cochlear implants. Study Design: The auditory performance of 98 children was measured with the Category of Auditory Performance...
6.
ONeill C, Archbold S, ODonoghue G, McAlister D, Nikolopoulos T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
. 2001 Mar;
58(1):53-7.
PMID: 11249980
Objective: To demonstrate the existence of variations in cost-utility associated with indirect costs in paediatric cochlear implantation; to illustrate the implications of this for purchasing decisions and; to posit a...
7.
Archbold S, Nikolopoulos T, Tait M, ODonoghue G, Lutman M, Gregory S
Br J Audiol
. 2000 Sep;
34(4):257-64.
PMID: 10997454
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between approach to communication, speech perception and speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation of young children with profound early deafness. A...
8.
ODonoghue G, Nikolopoulos T, Archbold S
Lancet
. 2000 Sep;
356(9228):466-8.
PMID: 10981890
Background: Cochlear implants provide access to the speech signal in those profoundly deaf children who derive no material benefit from acoustic hearing aids. Speech perception after implantation can vary widely--we...
9.
ONeill C, ODonoghue G, Archbold S, Normand C
Laryngoscope
. 2000 Jan;
110(1):156-60.
PMID: 10646733
Objective/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to explore the cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation, incorporating savings associated with education into the analysis. Methods: The costs of pediatric cochlear implantation...
10.
Nikolopoulos T, Archbold S, ODonoghue G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol
. 1999 Nov;
49 Suppl 1:S189-91.
PMID: 10577803
The time course for the development of auditory perception in prelingually deaf children following cochlear implantation may extend over many years, thus making long-term studies necessary to evaluate any such...