R V Shannon
Overview
Explore the profile of R V Shannon including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
58
Citations
3085
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Friesen L, Tremblay K, Rohila N, Wright R, Shannon R, Baskent D, et al.
Clin Neurophysiol
. 2009 Mar;
120(4):776-82.
PMID: 19250865
Objectives: (1) To determine if consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllables [Hillenbrand J, Getty L, Clark M, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:3099-3111] could be used...
2.
Rauschecker J, Shannon R
Science
. 2002 Feb;
295(5557):1025-9.
PMID: 11834822
The cochlear implant, a microelectrode array that directly stimulates the auditory nerve, has greatly benefited many individuals with profound deafness. Deaf patients without an intact auditory nerve may be helped...
3.
Friesen L, Shannon R, Baskent D, Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2001 Aug;
110(2):1150-63.
PMID: 11519582
Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition...
4.
Otto S, Brackman D, Hitselberger W, Shannon R
Otolaryngol Clin North Am
. 2001 Jun;
34(2):485-99.
PMID: 11419419
The multichannel auditory brainstem implant (ABI) has been used successfully to treat deafness in individuals with neurofibromatosis type II. The device has been implanted in nearly 150 recipients worldwide, and...
5.
Friesen L, Shannon R, Slattery 3rd W
J Am Acad Audiol
. 2000 Sep;
11(8):418-28.
PMID: 11012237
Speech recognition performance was measured as a function of electrode in two experiments with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant using 4-electrode SPEAK speech processors. In experiment 1, the four stimulated electrode...
6.
Fu Q, Shannon R
Ear Hear
. 2000 Jul;
21(3):227-35.
PMID: 10890731
Objective: To determine the consequences for phoneme recognition of errors in setting threshold and loudness levels in cochlear implant listeners using a 4-channel continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) speech processor. Design:...
7.
Eisenberg L, Shannon R, Martinez A, Wygonski J, BOOTHROYD A
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2000 Jun;
107(5 Pt 1):2704-10.
PMID: 10830392
Adult listeners are able to recognize speech even under conditions of severe spectral degradation. To assess the developmental time course of this robust pattern recognition, speech recognition was measured in...
8.
Chatterjee M, Fu Q, Shannon R
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2000 Mar;
107(3):1637-44.
PMID: 10738817
Loudness estimates were obtained in a group of four adult subjects implanted with the Nucleus-22 multielectrode cochlear implant device, for a range of pulse amplitudes and different fixed phase durations...
9.
Fu Q, Shannon R
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2000 Jan;
107(1):589-97.
PMID: 10641667
This study investigated the effect of pulsatile stimulation rate on medial vowel and consonant recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Experiment 1 measured phoneme recognition as a function of stimulation rate...
10.
Shannon R, Jensvold A, Padilla M, Robert M, Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2000 Jan;
106(6):L71-4.
PMID: 10615713
No abstract available.