R M Nosofsky
Overview
Explore the profile of R M Nosofsky including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
31
Citations
1533
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Nosofsky R, Palmeri T
Psychon Bull Rev
. 2013 Nov;
3(2):222-6.
PMID: 24213871
The authors tested 288 participants in the classic category-learning tasks introduced by Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). However, separable-dimension stimuli were used in previous tests, whereas integral-dimension stimuli were used...
2.
Zaki S, Nosofsky R
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci
. 2002 Dec;
1(4):344-59.
PMID: 12467086
In previous research (Reed, Squire, Patalano, Smith, & Jonides, 1999), amnesic patients performed at near normal levels in a categorization task involving stimuli with discrete features, but showed impaired recall...
3.
Cohen A, Nosofsky R, Zaki S
Mem Cognit
. 2002 Mar;
29(8):1165-75.
PMID: 11913753
Experiments were conducted in which observers learned to classify simple perceptual stimuli into low-variability and high-variability categories. Similarities between objects were measured in independent psychological-scaling tasks. The results showed that...
4.
Zaki S, Nosofsky R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2001 Aug;
27(4):1022-41.
PMID: 11486917
Recent findings from the perceptual old-new recognition literature indicate that observers have extremely high false-alarm rates to new items that are "blends" of old ones. In addition, evidence suggests that...
5.
Palmeri T, Nosofsky R
Q J Exp Psychol A
. 2001 Feb;
54(1):197-235.
PMID: 11216316
In three perceptual classification experiments involving ill-defined category structures, extreme prototype enhancement effects were observed in which prototypes were classified more accurately than other category instances. Such empirical findings can...
6.
Nosofsky R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn
. 2001 Feb;
26(6):1735-43.
PMID: 11185793
J. D. Smith and J. P. Minda (2000) conducted a meta-analysis of 30 data sets reported in the classification literature that involved use of the "5-4" category structure introduced by...
7.
Nosofsky R, Johansen M
Psychon Bull Rev
. 2000 Nov;
7(3):375-402.
PMID: 11082849
We demonstrate that a wide variety of recently reported "rule-described" and "prototype-described" phenomena in perceptual classification, which have led to the development of a number of multiple-system models, can be...
8.
Cohen A, Nosofsky R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform
. 2000 Oct;
26(5):1549-69.
PMID: 11039484
R. M. Nosofsky and T. J. Palmeri's (1997) exemplar-based random-walk (EBRW) model of speeded classification is extended to account for speeded same--different judgments among integral-dimension stimuli. According to the model,...
9.
Nosofsky R
Mem Cognit
. 1999 Mar;
27(1):78-93.
PMID: 10087858
Observers were tested in a perceptual category-learning experiment in which they were instructed to make classification decisions as rapidly as possible without making errors. Nosofsky and Palmeri's (1997b) exemplar-based random...
10.
Nosofsky R, Palmeri T
Percept Psychophys
. 1997 Nov;
59(7):1027-48.
PMID: 9360476
The authors compared the exemplar-based random-walk (EBRW) model of Nosofsky and Palmeri (1997) and the decision-bound model (DBM) of Ashby and Maddox (1994; Maddox & Ashby, 1996) on their ability...