Melanie L Matthies
Overview
Explore the profile of Melanie L Matthies including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
13
Citations
227
Followers
0
Related Specialty
Related Specialty
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Park Y, Perkell J, Matthies M, Stepp C
J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2019 Sep;
62(10):3655-3666.
PMID: 31525305
Purpose Previous studies of speech articulation have shown that individuals who can perceive smaller differences between similar-sounding phonemes showed larger contrasts in their productions of those phonemes. Here, a similar...
2.
Ghosh S, Matthies M, Maas E, Hanson A, Tiede M, Menard L, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2010 Nov;
128(5):3079-87.
PMID: 21110603
The relation between auditory acuity, somatosensory acuity and the magnitude of produced sibilant contrast was investigated with data from 18 participants. To measure auditory acuity, stimuli from a synthetic sibilant...
3.
Matthies M, Guenther F, Denny M, Perkell J, Burton E, Vick J, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2008 Dec;
124(5):3191-202.
PMID: 19045803
Tongue shape can vary greatly for allophones of /r/ produced in different phonetic contexts but the primary acoustic cue used by listeners, lowered F3, remains stable. For the current study,...
4.
Lane H, Matthies M, Guenther F, Denny M, Perkell J, Stockmann E, et al.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2007 Aug;
50(4):913-27.
PMID: 17675596
Purpose: To assess the effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts and to evaluate hypotheses arising from a model of speech motor planning....
5.
Menard L, Polak M, Denny M, Burton E, Lane H, Matthies M, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2007 Jun;
121(6):3790-801.
PMID: 17552727
This study investigates the effects of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production by postlingually deafened adults. Thirteen cochlear implant users produced repetitions of nine American English vowels prior...
6.
Perkell J, Lane H, Denny M, Matthies M, Tiede M, Zandipour M, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2007 May;
121(4):2296-311.
PMID: 17471743
The timing of changes in parameters of speech production was investigated in six cochlear implant users by switching their implant microphones off and on a number of times in a...
7.
Lane H, Denny M, Guenther F, Hanson H, Marrone N, Matthies M, et al.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2007 Mar;
50(1):2-14.
PMID: 17344544
Purpose: To describe cochlear implant users' phoneme labeling, discrimination, and prototypes for a vowel and a sibilant contrast, and to assess the effects of 1 year's experience with prosthetic hearing....
8.
Perkell J, Denny M, Lane H, Guenther F, Matthies M, Tiede M, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2007 Feb;
121(1):505-18.
PMID: 17297804
The role of auditory feedback in speech production was investigated by examining speakers' phonemic contrasts produced under increases in the noise to signal ratio (N/S). Seven cochlear implant users and...
9.
Lane H, Denny M, Guenther F, Matthies M, Menard L, Perkell J, et al.
J Acoust Soc Am
. 2005 Oct;
118(3 Pt 1):1636-46.
PMID: 16240823
This study explores the effects of hearing status and bite blocks on vowel production. Normal-hearing controls and postlingually deaf adults read elicitation lists of /hVd/ syllables with and without bite...
10.
Perkell J, Matthies M, Tiede M, Lane H, Zandipour M, Marrone N, et al.
J Speech Lang Hear Res
. 2005 Apr;
47(6):1259-69.
PMID: 15842009
This study examines individual differences in producing the sibilant contrast in American English and the relation of those differences to 2 speaker characteristics: (a) use of a quantal biomechanical effect...