Marius van Dijke
Overview
Explore the profile of Marius van Dijke including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
19
Citations
54
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
11.
De Cremer D, van Dijke M, Schminke M, De Schutter L, Stouten J
J Appl Psychol
. 2018 Jul;
103(12):1335-1357.
PMID: 30058813
We study when and why perceptions of trustworthiness trickle down the organizational hierarchy to influence the performance of subordinates. Building on social learning theory, we argue that when supervisors perceive...
12.
van Dijke M, De Cremer D, Langendijk G, Anderson C
J Appl Psychol
. 2017 Sep;
103(2):164-181.
PMID: 28933910
Research shows that power can lead to prosocial behavior by facilitating the behavioral expression of dispositional prosocial motivation. However, it is not clear how power may facilitate responses to contextual...
13.
Joosten A, van Dijke M, Van Hiel A, De Cremer D
PLoS One
. 2015 May;
10(5):e0126377.
PMID: 26024380
Lack of self-control has been suggested to facilitate norm-transgressing behaviors because of the operation of automatic selfish impulses. Previous research, however, has shown that people having a high moral identity...
14.
Bianchi E, Brockner J, van den Bos K, Seifert M, Moon H, van Dijke M, et al.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull
. 2014 Nov;
41(1):19-34.
PMID: 25387762
Reactions to decisions are shaped by both outcome and procedural fairness. Moreover, outcome and procedural fairness interact to influence beliefs and behaviors. However, different types of "process/outcome" interaction effects have...
15.
De Cremer D, van Dijke M, Mayer D
J Appl Psychol
. 2010 Sep;
95(6):1121-33.
PMID: 20804231
We developed a model predicting that leaders are most effective in stimulating follower cooperation when they consistently treat all group members in a fair manner and are prototypical (i.e., representative...
16.
van Dijke M, De Cremer D, Mayer D
J Appl Psychol
. 2010 May;
95(3):488-502.
PMID: 20476828
Building on fairness heuristic theory, fairness theory, and trust development models, we argue that unfairly enacted procedures decrease followers' trust in the authority particularly when authorities have high power over...
17.
De Cremer D, Brockner J, Fishman A, van Dijke M, van Olffen W, Mayer D
J Appl Psychol
. 2010 Mar;
95(2):291-304.
PMID: 20230070
Prior research has shown that procedural fairness interacts with outcome fairness to influence employees' work attitudes (e.g., organizational commitment) and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior), such that employees'...
18.
De Cremer D, Mayer D, van Dijke M, Bardes M, Schouten B
J Appl Psychol
. 2009 Jul;
94(4):887-99.
PMID: 19594232
In the present set of studies, the authors examine the idea that self-sacrificial leadership motivates follower prosocial behavior, particularly among followers with a prevention focus. Drawing on the self-sacrificial leadership...
19.
Bolman C, Lechner L, van Dijke M
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
. 2007 Sep;
4:42.
PMID: 17880734
Background: People often have misperceptions (overestimation or underestimation) about the health-related behaviours they engage in, which may have adverse consequences for their susceptibility to behavioural change. Misperception is usually measured...