Luc J Strobbe
Overview
Explore the profile of Luc J Strobbe including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
17
Citations
721
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Luiten J, Korte B, Voogd A, Vreuls W, Luiten E, Strobbe L, et al.
Int J Cancer
. 2019 Apr;
145(10):2720-2727.
PMID: 31001821
Between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, we studied the incidence, management and outcome of high-risk breast lesions in a consecutive series of 376,519 screens of women who received...
2.
van Bommel R, Lameijer J, Voogd A, Nederend J, Louwman M, Setz-Pels W, et al.
Eur J Radiol
. 2018 Nov;
108:215-221.
PMID: 30396659
Background: Unilateral interval breast cancers show less favourable prognostic features than unilateral screen-detected cancers, but data on tumour characteristics of bilateral interval cancers in a systematically screened population are sparse....
3.
Coolen A, Voogd A, Strobbe L, Louwman M, Tjan-Heijnen V, Duijm L
Br J Cancer
. 2018 Jul;
119(4):503-507.
PMID: 30038325
Background: To determine the impact of the second reader on screening outcome at blinded double reading of digital screening mammograms. Methods: We included a consecutive series of 99,013 digital screening...
4.
Coolen A, Lameijer J, Voogd A, Louwman M, Strobbe L, Tjan-Heijnen V, et al.
Eur Radiol
. 2018 Jun;
29(1):337-344.
PMID: 29943181
Objectives: To analyse which mammographic and tumour characteristics led to concordant versus discordant recalls at blinded double reading to further optimise our breast cancer screening programme. Methods: We included a...
5.
Lameijer J, Coolen A, Voogd A, Strobbe L, Louwman M, Venderink D, et al.
Eur Radiol
. 2018 Jun;
29(2):1059.
PMID: 29943179
The original version of this article, published on 17 April 2018, unfortunately contained a mistake.
6.
Coolen A, Lameijer J, Voogd A, Strobbe L, Louwman M, Tjan-Heijnen V, et al.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
. 2018 May;
171(1):143-149.
PMID: 29730729
Purpose: We determined whether the addition of the technologist's opinion may be helpful in deciding if discordant readings at blinded double reading should be recalled. Methods: A consecutive series of...
7.
Lameijer J, Coolen A, Voogd A, Strobbe L, Louwman M, Venderink D, et al.
Eur Radiol
. 2018 Apr;
28(10):4205-4214.
PMID: 29666991
Purpose: To determine the frequency and characteristics of contralateral, non-recalled breast abnormalities following recall at screening mammography. Methods: We included a series of 130,338 screening mammograms performed between 1 January...
8.
van Bommel R, Voogd A, Nederend J, Setz-Pels W, Louwman M, Strobbe L, et al.
Breast
. 2018 Jan;
38:101-106.
PMID: 29306176
Background: Detected by screening mammography, bilateral breast cancer has a different pathological profile compared to unilateral breast cancer. We investigated the incidence of bilateral interval breast cancers and compared their...
9.
Weenk M, Wunschel P, Heine E, Strobbe L
Gland Surg
. 2017 Feb;
6(1):43-48.
PMID: 28210551
Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy has shown to be oncologically safe and to improve quality of life in breast cancer patients. However, most women undergoing mastectomy do not...
10.
van Bommel R, Voogd A, Louwman M, Strobbe L, Venderink D, Duijm L
Eur Radiol
. 2016 May;
27(2):553-561.
PMID: 27180183
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine screening outcome in women recalled twice for the same mammographic lesion before, during, and after transition from screen-film (SFM) to...