» Authors » James S Williams Jr

James S Williams Jr

Explore the profile of James S Williams Jr including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles. Areas
Snapshot
Articles 16
Citations 152
Followers 0
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Vasavada K, Vasavada V, Moran J, Devana S, Lee C, Hame S, et al.
Orthop J Sports Med . 2024 Nov; 12(11):23259671241291920. PMID: 39555321
Background: As machine learning becomes increasingly utilized in orthopaedic clinical research, the application of machine learning methodology to cohort data from the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) presents a valuable...
2.
Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Pennings J, Allen C, Cooper D, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2024 Nov; 52(13):3286-3294. PMID: 39503722
Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been documented to have inferior outcomes compared with primary ACL reconstruction. The reasons why remain unknown. Purpose: To determine whether surgical factors...
3.
Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Pennings J, Allen C, Cooper D, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2023 Feb; 51(3):605-614. PMID: 36734487
Background: Meniscal and chondral damage is common in the patient undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Purpose: To determine if meniscal and/or articular cartilage pathology at the time of...
4.
DeFroda S, Owens B, Wright R, Huston L, Pennings J, Haas A, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2022 Jul; 50(9):2397-2409. PMID: 35833922
Background: Lytic or malpositioned tunnels may require bone grafting during revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (rACLR) surgery. Patient characteristics and effects of grafting on outcomes after rACLR are not well...
5.
Bigouette J, Owen E, Lantz B, Hoellrich R, Wright R, Huston L, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2022 Jun; 50(7):1788-1797. PMID: 35648628
Background: Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires postoperatively compared to cohorts with primary ACL reconstruction. In a previously active population, it...
6.
Todic J, Cook S, Spitzer-Shohat S, Williams Jr J, Battle B, Jackson J, et al.
Acad Med . 2022 Mar; 97(7):977-988. PMID: 35353723
Achieving optimal health for all requires confronting the complex legacies of colonialism and white supremacy embedded in all institutions, including health care institutions. As a result, health care organizations committed...
7.
Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Pennings J, Allen C, Cooper D, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2021 Jul; 49(10):2589-2598. PMID: 34260326
Background: Although graft choice may be limited in the revision setting based on previously used grafts, most surgeons believe that graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an...
8.
Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Nwosu S, Allen C, Anderson A, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2020 Aug; 48(12):2978-2985. PMID: 32822238
Background: Meniscal preservation has been demonstrated to contribute to long-term knee health. This has been a successful intervention in patients with isolated tears and tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament...
9.
Wright R, Huston L, Haas A, Allen C, Anderson A, Cooper D, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2019 Jul; 47(10):2394-2401. PMID: 31318611
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a valid measure of results after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes when compared with...
10.
Bigouette J, Owen E, Lantz B, Hoellrich R, Huston L, Haas A, et al.
Am J Sports Med . 2019 Jun; 47(9):2056-2066. PMID: 31225999
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cohorts continually report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires than primary ACL cohorts at similar time points after surgery. It is unclear how...