Curt A Carlson
Overview
Explore the profile of Curt A Carlson including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
7
Citations
43
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Carlson C, Hemby J, Wooten A, Jones A, Lockamyeir R, Carlson M, et al.
Cogn Res Princ Implic
. 2021 Mar;
6(1):14.
PMID: 33660118
The diagnostic feature-detection theory (DFT) of eyewitness identification is based on facial information that is diagnostic versus non-diagnostic of suspect guilt. It primarily has been tested by discounting non-diagnostic information...
2.
Weatherford D, Meltzer M, Carlson C, Bartlett J
Mem Cognit
. 2020 Aug;
49(2):323-339.
PMID: 32844382
Verbal facilitation occurs when describing a face improves its subsequent recognition; but there are several theoretical explanations debated in the literature. The results of the present studies support a relatively...
3.
Carlson C, Jones A, Whittington J, Lockamyeir R, Carlson M, Wooten A
Cogn Res Princ Implic
. 2019 Jun;
4(1):20.
PMID: 31197501
Researchers have argued that simultaneous lineups should follow the principle of propitious heterogeneity, based on the idea that if the fillers are too similar to the perpetrator even an eyewitness...
4.
Carlson C, Gronlund S
Memory
. 2011 Nov;
19(8):916-29.
PMID: 22035407
Gronlund ( 2005 ) proposed that one factor leading to a sequential line-up advantage could be the greater likelihood of recollecting distinctive information about a perpetrator when using a sequential...
5.
Goodsell C, Gronlund S, Carlson C
Law Hum Behav
. 2010 Jan;
34(6):445-59.
PMID: 20076995
Advocates claim that the sequential lineup is an improvement over simultaneous lineup procedures, but no formal (quantitatively specified) explanation exists for why it is better. The computational model WITNESS (Clark,...
6.
Gronlund S, Carlson C, Dailey S, Goodsell C
J Exp Psychol Appl
. 2009 Jul;
15(2):140-152.
PMID: 19586253
A growing movement in the United States and around the world involves promoting the advantages of conducting an eyewitness lineup in a sequential manner. We conducted a large study (N...
7.
Carlson C, Gronlund S, Clark S
J Exp Psychol Appl
. 2008 Jul;
14(2):118-128.
PMID: 18590368
N. M. Steblay, J. Dysart, S. Fulero, and R. C. L. Lindsay (2001) argued that sequential lineups reduce the likelihood of mistaken eyewitness identification. Experiment 1 replicated the design of...