Brendan P OConnell
Overview
Explore the profile of Brendan P OConnell including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
95
Citations
1034
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Thompson N, Park L, OConnell B, Zdanski C, Brown K, Anderson M
Cochlear Implants Int
. 2024 Feb;
25(3):191-196.
PMID: 38353257
Objectives: Children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) have wide variability in outcomes with cochlear implant (CI) use. The current study aims to report a large cohort of pediatric CI recipients...
2.
Dillon M, Buss E, Johnson A, Canfarotta M, OConnell B
Audiol Neurootol
. 2023 Jul;
28(6):478-487.
PMID: 37482054
Introduction: Cochlear implant (CI) and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users may experience better performance with maps that align the electric filter frequencies to the cochlear place frequencies, known as place-based maps,...
3.
Dillon M, Canfarotta M, Buss E, Rooth M, Richter M, Overton A, et al.
Am J Audiol
. 2023 Feb;
32(1):251-260.
PMID: 36800505
Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with hearing preservation experience significant improvements in speech recognition with electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) as compared to with a CI alone, although outcomes across EAS users...
4.
Dillon M, OConnell B, Canfarotta M, Buss E, Hopfinger J
Am J Audiol
. 2022 Apr;
31(2):322-337.
PMID: 35394798
Purpose: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients demonstrate variable speech recognition when listening with a CI-alone or electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) device, which may be due in part to electric frequency-to-place mismatches created...
5.
Vos T, Brown K, Buss E, Bucker A, Dedmon M, OConnell B, et al.
Audiol Neurootol
. 2021 Nov;
27(3):227-234.
PMID: 34808626
Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the influence of postponing the first post-activation follow-up due to the COVID-19 pandemic on the aided sound field detection thresholds and...
6.
Canfarotta M, Dillon M, Brown K, Pillsbury H, Dedmon M, OConnell B
Otol Neurotol
. 2021 Nov;
43(2):183-189.
PMID: 34772886
Objectives: 1) To compare speech recognition outcomes between cochlear implant (CI) recipients of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays, and 2) to characterize the relationship between angular insertion depth...
7.
Lopez E, Dillon M, Park L, Rooth M, Richter M, Thompson N, et al.
Otol Neurotol
. 2021 Jul;
42(9):e1234-e1241.
PMID: 34224547
Objective: Assess the influence of cochlear implant (CI) use on the perceived listening effort of adult and pediatric subjects with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) or asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). Study...
8.
Murr A, Canfarotta M, OConnell B, Buss E, King E, Bucker A, et al.
Laryngoscope
. 2021 May;
131(9):2106-2111.
PMID: 34043247
Objectives/hypothesis: Speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) tends to be better for younger adults than older adults. However, older adults may take longer to reach asymptotic performance than younger...
9.
Dillon M, Canfarotta M, Buss E, Hopfinger J, OConnell B
Otol Neurotol
. 2021 Apr;
42(1):197-202.
PMID: 33885267
Background: The default mapping procedure for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) devices uses the cochlear implant recipient's unaided detection thresholds in the implanted ear to derive the acoustic settings and assign the...
10.
Hollis E, Canfarotta M, Dillon M, Rooth M, Bucker A, Dillon S, et al.
Otol Neurotol
. 2021 Apr;
42(8):1149-1155.
PMID: 33859134
Objectives: To characterize the relationship between cochlear duct length (CDL) and initial hearing preservation among cochlear implant recipients of a fully inserted 31.5 mm flexible lateral wall electrode array. Study...