Ben Jm Hermans
Overview
Explore the profile of Ben Jm Hermans including associated specialties, affiliations and a list of published articles.
Author names and details appear as published. Due to indexing inconsistencies, multiple individuals may share a name, and a single author may have variations. MedLuna displays this data as publicly available, without modification or verification
Snapshot
Snapshot
Articles
4
Citations
6
Followers
0
Related Specialties
Related Specialties
Top 10 Co-Authors
Top 10 Co-Authors
Published In
Published In
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Recent Articles
1.
Farnir F, Chaldoupi S, Hermans B, Hermans B, Farnir F, Habibi Z, et al.
Heart Rhythm
. 2025 Jan;
PMID: 39828072
Background: Focal pulsed field ablation (F-PFA) integrated in electroanatomic mapping systems allows tailored lesion sets in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective: We aimed to determine feasibility, safety, and 6-month...
2.
Ozgul O, Marques V, Hermans B, van Hunnik A, Verheule S, Gharaviri A, et al.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
. 2024 Aug;
72(1):79-89.
PMID: 39106138
Objective: Repetitive atrial activation patterns (RAAPs) during complex atrial tachycardia could be associated with localized mechanisms that can be targeted. Clinically available electroanatomical mapping systems are limited by either the...
3.
Ozgul O, Hermans B, van Hunnik A, Verheule S, Schotten U, Bonizzi P, et al.
Comput Biol Med
. 2023 Apr;
159:106920.
PMID: 37119551
Background: Repetitive atrial activation patterns (RAAPs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) may be associated with localized mechanisms that maintain AF. Current electro-anatomical mapping systems are unsuitable for analyzing RAAPs due to...
4.
Delhaas T, Andriessen P, van Laar J, Vullings R, Hermans B, Niemarkt H, et al.
PLoS One
. 2019 Aug;
14(8):e0221220.
PMID: 31437178
The conclusion of our recent paper that performance of the STAN device in clinical practice is potentially limited by high false-negative and high false-positive STAN-event rates and loss of ST...
5.
Zwanenburg A, Hermans B, Andriessen P, Niemarkt H, Jellema R, Ophelders D, et al.
Pediatr Res
. 2016 Feb;
79(6):907-15.
PMID: 26866904
Background: Current methods for assessing perinatal hypoxic conditions did not improve infant outcomes. Various waveform-based and interval-based ECG markers have been suggested, but not directly compared. We compare performance of...