» Articles » PMID: 9933527

Sex Roles and Sexual Selection

Overview
Journal Anim Behav
Date 1999 May 18
PMID 9933527
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sexual selection has been portrayed as acting predominantly on males who compete with each other over copulatory access to females; selection was considered to be driven by females choosing between males at the pre- or postcopulatory level. However, a broader view of sexual selection is now emerging. Examining male discrimination between females and female-female competition has been beneficial in identifying factors influencing the direction and strength of sexual selection. Furthermore, consideration of processes such as sexual coercion or genetic incompatibility, which indirectly influence an individual's set of copulation partners, gamete set or their offspring success, has helped to clarify the ways in which sexual selection may operate. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that not all copulations translate directly to paternity and that paternity does not necessarily translate into successful offspring. Postcopulatory and postfertilization mechanisms that influence not only paternity share but offspring recruitment now require further consideration. The benefits to each sex of copulating with particular partners or with more than one partner remains an area of debate. More carefully designed studies which eliminate alternative possibilities or quantify the relative importance of different selective pressures will also benefit from considering that not all copulations function solely to inseminate or receive sperm. It is also now clear that not all individuals of one sex follow the same strategy. Examining the variation between individuals in reproductive behaviour, fertilization success and offspring success will be important in establishing the selective pressures and mechanisms underlying the operation of sexual selection. (c) 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Citing Articles

Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in an Insect With High Levels of Mating Failure.

Balfour V, Armand M, Shuker D Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(10):e70407.

PMID: 39421326 PMC: 11483530. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70407.


Acoustic difference in advertisement calls among two sympatric species: A confirmatory case to acoustic niche hypothesis and morphological constraint hypothesis.

Shen T, Liu J, Tang X, Peng C, Li S, Feng C Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(4):e11318.

PMID: 38654713 PMC: 11036132. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11318.


Primate sexual swellings as coevolved signal systems.

Stallmann R, Froehlich J Primates. 2018; 41(1):1-16.

PMID: 30545187 DOI: 10.1007/BF02557457.


Cultural sexual selection in monogamous human populations.

Nakahashi W R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(6):160946.

PMID: 28680657 PMC: 5493899. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160946.


Mate choice for major histocompatibility complex complementarity in a strictly monogamous bird, the grey partridge ().

Rymesova D, Kralova T, Promerova M, Bryja J, Tomasek O, Svobodova J Front Zool. 2017; 14:9.

PMID: 28239400 PMC: 5312559. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-017-0194-0.