» Articles » PMID: 9931077

Safety of Nifedipine in Angina Pectoris: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Hypertension
Date 1999 Feb 4
PMID 9931077
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

-Our objective was to compare cardiovascular event rates in patients with stable angina receiving nifedipine as monotherapy or combination therapy and in active drug controls. A MEDLARS search of published articles from 1966 to 1995 in English, French, German, Italian, or Spanish, supplemented by a manual search of bibliographies, identified 60 randomized controlled trials that met protocol criteria. Blinded articles were extracted by 2 physicians. The pooled risks of death, withdrawal, and cardiovascular event were computed and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) for all nifedipine formulations and relative to same study control drug regimens. Thirty cardiovascular events were reported in 2635 nifedipine exposures (1.14%) and 19 events in 2655 other active drug exposures (0.72%). Unadjusted ORs for nifedipine versus controls were 1.40 (95% CI, 0.56 to 3.49) for major events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization procedure), 1.75 (95% CI, 0.83 to 3.67) for increased angina, and 1.61 (95% CI, 0.91 to 2.87) for all events (major events plus increased angina). Episodes of increased angina were more frequent on immediate-release nifedipine (OR, 4.19 [95% CI, 1.41 to 12.49]) and on nifedipine monotherapy (OR, 2.61 [95% CI, 1.30 to 5.26]). The OR for immediate-release nifedipine was significantly higher than that for sustained-release/extended-release nifedipine (P=0.001), and the OR for nifedipine monotherapy was higher than that for nifedipine combination therapy (P=0.03). Increased risks of cardiovascular events in patients with stable angina on nifedipine were due primarily to more episodes of increased angina, confined to the immediate-release formulation and to nifedipine monotherapy.

Citing Articles

Long-acting nifedipine in the management of essential hypertension: a review for cardiologists.

Hazra P, Mehta A, Desai B, Pandey U, Mehta K, Bajpai S Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2025; 14(6):396-413.

PMID: 39839565 PMC: 11744219. DOI: 10.62347/RPMZ6407.


Calcium Channel Blockers in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention and Risk of Acute Events: Real-World Evidence from Nested Case-Control Studies on Italian Hypertensive Elderly.

Bettiol A, Lucenteforte E, Vannacci A, Lombardi N, Onder G, Agabiti N Clin Drug Investig. 2017; 37(12):1165-1174.

PMID: 28975522 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-017-0576-2.


Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event.

Warren F, Abrams K, Golder S, Sutton A BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:64.

PMID: 22553987 PMC: 3528446. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-64.


Cilnidipine, a slow-acting Ca2+ channel blocker, induces relaxation in porcine coronary artery: role of endothelial nitric oxide and [Ca2+]i.

Leung H, Yao X, Leung F, Ko W, Chen Z, Gollasch M Br J Pharmacol. 2005; 147(1):55-63.

PMID: 16299554 PMC: 1615842. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706450.


Improving safety reporting from randomised trials.

Ioannidis J, Lau J Drug Saf. 2002; 25(2):77-84.

PMID: 11888350 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225020-00002.