» Articles » PMID: 9925080

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation: Successful Outcome in Patients with Acute Lung Injury/ARDS

Overview
Journal Chest
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 1999 Jan 30
PMID 9925080
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is increasing support for the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure. Highest success rates are recorded in patients with exacerbation of COPD, particularly in patients presenting primarily with hypercarbic respiratory failure. Success has been more limited in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, and there are few reports of NPPV in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or ARDS.

Objectives: We report the outcome of 12 episodes of ALI/ARDS in 10 patients treated with NPPV.

Design: Experiential cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center and university hospital ICU.

Intervention: Provision of NPPV in patients with ALI/ARDS.

Results: Group median (range) APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score was 16 (11 to 29). Success rate (avoidance of intubation and no further assisted ventilation for 72 h) was achieved on six of nine occasions (66%) when NPPV was used as the initial mode of assisted ventilation. It failed after three episodes of planned (1) or self (2) extubation. Duration of successful NPPV was 64.5 h (23.5 to 80.5 h) with ICU discharge in the next 24 to 48 h for three of six patients. Unsuccessful episodes lasted 7.3 h (0.1 to 116 h) with need for conventional ventilation for an additional 5 days (2.7 to 14 days). Survival (ICU and hospital) for the 10 patients was 70%.

Conclusions: In a group of hemodynamically stable patients with severe ALI, NPPV had a high success rate. NPPV should be considered as a treatment option for patients in stable condition in the early phase of ALI/ARDS.

Citing Articles

Monitoring and modulation of respiratory drive in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in spontaneous breathing.

Mocellin A, Guidotti F, Rizzato S, Tacconi M, Bruzzi G, Messina J Intern Emerg Med. 2024; 19(8):2105-2119.

PMID: 39207721 PMC: 11582292. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03715-3.


The Impact of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Application Timing on Emergency Room Length of Stay in Patients With Pulmonary Edema: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Khayat S, Ali M, Almasoudi L, Fatani A, Albarnawi W, Bsooki M Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e33193.

PMID: 36601212 PMC: 9806280. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33193.


Evidence-based airway management protocol for a critical ill patient in medical intensive care unit: Systematic review.

Admass B, Endalew N, Tawye H, Yaregal Melesse D, Workie M, Filatie T Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 80:104284.

PMID: 36045781 PMC: 9422313. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104284.


The effects of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection on cardiovascular diseases and cardiopulmonary injuries.

Li N, Zhu L, Sun L, Shao G Stem Cell Res. 2021; 51:102168.

PMID: 33485182 PMC: 7801189. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102168.


Efficacy and safety of early prone positioning combined with HFNC or NIV in moderate to severe ARDS: a multi-center prospective cohort study.

Ding L, Wang L, Ma W, He H Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):28.

PMID: 32000806 PMC: 6993481. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2738-5.