» Articles » PMID: 9895071

Development and Psychometric Testing of a Quality of Recovery Score After General Anesthesia and Surgery in Adults

Overview
Journal Anesth Analg
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1999 Jan 23
PMID 9895071
Citations 98
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: A variety of methods have been used to quantify aspects of recovery after anesthesia. Most are narrowly focused, are not patient-rated, and have not been validated. We therefore set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score. We constructed a 61-item questionnaire that asked individuals (patients and relatives, medical and nursing staff; total n = 136) to rate various postoperative items describing features a patient may experience postoperatively. The most highly ranked items were included in a final nine-point index score, which we called the "QoR Score." We then studied two cohorts of surgical patients (n = 449). There was good convergent validity between the QoR Score and the visual analog scale score (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Discriminant construct validity was supported by comparing resultant QoR Scores in patients undergoing day-stay, minor, and major surgery (P = 0.008), as well as a negative correlation with duration of hospital stay (rho = -0.20, P < 0.0001), and, using multivariate regression, demonstrating a significant negative relationship between QoR Score and female gender (P = 0.048) and older age (P = 0.041). There was also good interrater agreement (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001), test-retest reliability (median rho = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and internal consistency (alpha = 0.57 and 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the groups of patients recovering from major and minor surgery (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the QoR Score has good validity, reliability, and clinical acceptability in patients undergoing many types of surgery.

Implications: We set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score (QoR) that could be used both as a measure of outcome in perioperative trials and for clinical audit. We first surveyed patients and staff to identify important aspects of recovery, then developed a nine-point QoR Score. This was then compared with other measures of postoperative outcome. We found that the QoR Score is a useful measure of recovery after anesthesia and surgery.

Citing Articles

Effect of prehabilitation exercises on postoperative frailty in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Yang F, Yuan Y, Liu W, Tang C, He F, Chen D Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1411353.

PMID: 39328202 PMC: 11424377. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1411353.


VALIDATION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY-40 QUESTIONNAIRE ADAPTED FOR CROATIAN POPULATION.

Sulen N, Simurina T, Milosevic M, Zupcic M, Mraovic B Acta Clin Croat. 2024; 62(3):426-436.

PMID: 39310682 PMC: 11414013. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.03.4.


Measuring quality in obstetric anaesthesia.

Bamber J, Sultan P BJA Educ. 2024; 24(8):296-303.

PMID: 39099751 PMC: 11293573. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2024.04.005.


Effect of Rectus Sheath Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Transabdominal Midline Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cheng C, Wang J, Cao Y, Gu E, Liu X J Pain Res. 2024; 17:2155-2163.

PMID: 38915478 PMC: 11194829. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S460367.


Effect of bilateral low serratus anterior plane block on quality of recovery after trans-subxiphoid robotic thymectomy: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Fu Y, Fu H, Wei W, Liu H, Wen Z, Lv X Int J Med Sci. 2024; 21(7):1241-1249.

PMID: 38818461 PMC: 11134578. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.91797.