» Articles » PMID: 9893575

Variability in Knee Radiographing: Implication for Definition of Radiological Progression in Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Overview
Journal Ann Rheum Dis
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 1999 Jan 20
PMID 9893575
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: (1) To assess reproducibility of medial knee joint space width (JSW) measurement in healthy subjects and osteoarthritic (OA) patients. (2) To define minimal relevant radiological change in knee JSW based on the reproducibility of its measurement.

Patients And Methods: (1) Healthy volunteers: in the first part of the study, 20 knees of healthy adult volunteers were radiographed in the weightbearing, anteroposterior extended view, twice, two weeks apart, using three different radiographic procedures: (a) without guidelines, (b) with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, (c) with guidelines and fluoroscopy. (2) Knee OA patients: in the second part of the study, 36 knees of OA patients were radiographed twice with guidelines and without fluoroscopy. JSW was measured blindly using a graduated magnifying glass. Based on the Bland and Altman graphic approach, cut off points defining minimal relevant radiological change are proposed.

Results: Standard deviation (SD) of differences in JSW measurement between two sets of knee radiographs in healthy subjects were 0.66 mm for radiography performed without guidelines, 0.37 mm for radiography performed with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, and 0.31 mm for radiography with guidelines and fluoroscopy. SD of differences in JSW measurement in OA patients were 0.32 mm for radiography performed with guidelines and without fluoroscopy. A minimal relevant change in JSW between two radiographs performed in healthy subjects can be defined by a change of at least 1.29 or 0.59 mm when radiographs are taken without guidelines, and with guidelines and fluoroscopy, respectively. When radiographs are taken with guidelines and without fluoroscopy, the change must be at least 0.73 mm. A similar figure, 0.64 mm was observed in knee OA patients.

Conclusion: Definition of radiological progression varies greatly according to the radiographic procedure chosen. Use of guidelines reduces the threshold of progression required to consider that change between two measures is relevant.

Citing Articles

The relationship between quadriceps femoris thickness measured by US and femoral cartilage thickness in knee osteoarthritis, its effect on radiographic stage and clinical parameters: comparison with healthy young population.

Bozan A, Erhan B J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2023; 8(3):155-162.

PMID: 37663162 PMC: 10472037. DOI: 10.22540/JFSF-08-155.


Analysis of the determinant factor of the medial joint space width after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Jeong H, Shim S, Park S, Lee Y Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(8):4879-4888.

PMID: 36813946 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04818-w.


C-Terminal Cross-Linked Telopeptides of Type II Collagen as Biomarker for Radiological Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis.

Cheng H, Hao B, Sun J, Yin M Cartilage. 2018; 11(4):512-520.

PMID: 30221987 PMC: 7488952. DOI: 10.1177/1947603518798884.


Novel Approach to Estimate Osteoarthritis Progression: Use of the Reliable Change Index in the Evaluation of Joint Space Loss.

Parsons C, Judge A, Leyland K, Bruyere O, Petit Dop F, Chapurlat R Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018; 71(2):300-307.

PMID: 29741284 PMC: 6129388. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23596.


Test-retest reliability of tibiofemoral joint space width measurements made using a low-dose standing CT scanner.

Segal N, Bergin J, Kern A, Findlay C, Anderson D Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 46(2):217-222.

PMID: 27909787 PMC: 5179299. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2539-8.