» Articles » PMID: 9879504

Do Active Site Conformations of Small Ligands Correspond to Low Free-energy Solution Structures?

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 1999 Jan 8
PMID 9879504
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We compare the low free energy structures of ten small, polar ligands in solution to their conformations in their respective receptor active sites. The solution conformations are generated by a systematic search and the free energies of representative structures are computed with a continuum solvation model. Based on the values of torsion angles, we find little similarity between low energy solution structures of small ligands and their active site conformations. However, in nine out of ten cases, the positions of 'anchor points' (key atoms responsible for tight binding) in the lowest energy solution structures are very similar to the positions of these atoms in the active site conformations. A metric that more closely captures the essentials of binding supports the basic premise underlying pharmacophore mapping, namely that active site conformations of small flexible ligands correspond to their low energy structures in solution. This work supports the efforts of building pharmacophore models based on the information present in solution structures of small isolated ligands.

Citing Articles

Applying atomistic neural networks to bias conformer ensembles towards bioactive-like conformations.

Baillif B, Cole J, Giangreco I, McCabe P, Bender A J Cheminform. 2023; 15(1):124.

PMID: 38129933 PMC: 10740246. DOI: 10.1186/s13321-023-00794-w.


Insights into the Pharmacological Effects of Flavonoids: The Systematic Review of Computer Modeling.

Taldaev A, Terekhov R, Nikitin I, Zhevlakova A, Selivanova I Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(11).

PMID: 35682702 PMC: 9181432. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23116023.


Evaluation of 3-Dimensionality in Approved and Experimental Drug Space.

Prosser K, Stokes R, Cohen S ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020; 11(6):1292-1298.

PMID: 32551014 PMC: 7294711. DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00121.


Accelerated CDOCKER with GPUs, Parallel Simulated Annealing, and Fast Fourier Transforms.

Ding X, Wu Y, Wang Y, Vilseck J, Brooks 3rd C J Chem Theory Comput. 2020; 16(6):3910-3919.

PMID: 32374996 PMC: 7495732. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00145.


BCL::MolAlign: Three-Dimensional Small Molecule Alignment for Pharmacophore Mapping.

Brown B, Mendenhall J, Meiler J J Chem Inf Model. 2019; 59(2):689-701.

PMID: 30707580 PMC: 6598199. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00020.


References
1.
Jorgensen W . Rusting of the lock and key model for protein-ligand binding. Science. 1991; 254(5034):954-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1719636. View

2.
Mayer D, Naylor C, Motoc I, Marshall G . A unique geometry of the active site of angiotensin-converting enzyme consistent with structure-activity studies. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1987; 1(1):3-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF01680553. View

3.
Dammkoehler R, Karasek S, Shands E, Marshall G . Constrained search of conformational hyperspace. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1989; 3(1):3-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF01590992. View

4.
Weber P, Ohlendorf D, Wendoloski J, Salemme F . Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science. 1989; 243(4887):85-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.2911722. View

5.
MARTIN Y . 3D database searching in drug design. J Med Chem. 1992; 35(12):2145-54. DOI: 10.1021/jm00090a001. View