» Articles » PMID: 9873953

Difference in Microbes Contaminating Pancreatic Necrosis in Biliary and Alcoholic Pancreatitis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1999 Jan 5
PMID 9873953
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conclusion: There are differences in the microbiology of infected pancreatic necrosis in alcoholic and biliary pancreatitis. One possible explanation may be different routes of contamination.

Background: Infection is a severe complication in acute pancreatitis. Bacteria are found in 40-70% of all patients suffering from necrotizing pancreatitis. We investigated whether there were any differences in microbes isolated from pancreatic necrosis in biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis.

Methods: Microbiological tests were conducted on necrosis taken at the operation for pancreatitis with the etiology of (group A) alcoholic pancreatitis (n = 47) and (group B) biliary pancreatitis (n = 23). Patients with simultaneous cholecystitis were excluded. The time from the first symptoms to the operation or the extent of necrosis did not differ between the groups.

Results: Microbes were isolated more often in the cultures from group B than group A (17/23 = 74% vs 15/47 = 32%, p = 0.001). The most common were Gram-positive bacteria in group A and Gram-negative bacteria in group B. From the first week, from the onset of symptoms to the operation. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated significantly more often in the cultures from group B patients than from group A patients (8/10 = 80% vs 1/5 = 20%, p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, we found that biliary pancreatitis was an independent risk factor (adds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-52.10) of contamination of necrosis with Gram-negative bacteria.

Citing Articles

Controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis: An update.

Manrai M, Dawra S, Singh A, Jha D, Kochhar R World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(12):2582-2603.

PMID: 37214572 PMC: 10198120. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i12.2582.


Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Ideal Imaging Method to Detect Infection in Pancreatic Collections: A Brief Primer for the Gastroenterologists.

Sureka B, Rai B, Varshney V, Nag V, Garg M, Garg P Cureus. 2022; 14(1):e21530.

PMID: 35223305 PMC: 8863503. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21530.


Infected pancreatic necrosis and retroperitoneal abscess associated with .

Miwa T, Tanaka H, Shiojiri T BMJ Case Rep. 2021; 14(8).

PMID: 34362752 PMC: 8351486. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-243936.


Effects of probiotic supplementation on markers of acute pancreatitis in rats.

Horst N, Marques R, Diestel C, Matzke B, Caetano C, Simoes F Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2014; 70(2):136-48.

PMID: 24683225 PMC: 3967288. DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2009.04.004.


Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of severe acute pancreatitis.

Kong L, Santiago N, Han T, Zhang S World J Gastroenterol. 2004; 10(22):3336-8.

PMID: 15484312 PMC: 4572307. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3336.


References
1.
Acosta J, Pellegrini C, SKINNER D . Etiology and pathogenesis of acute biliary pancreatitis. Surgery. 1980; 88(1):118-25. View

2.
Buchler M, Malfertheiner P, Friess H, Isenmann R, Vanek E, Grimm H . Human pancreatic tissue concentration of bactericidal antibiotics. Gastroenterology. 1992; 103(6):1902-8. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91450-i. View

3.
Beger H, Bittner R, Block S, Buchler M . Bacterial contamination of pancreatic necrosis. A prospective clinical study. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91(2):433-8. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90579-2. View

4.
Paajanen H, Jaakkola M, Karjalainen J, Oksanen H, Nordback I . Changing strategies in the surgical management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Int Surg. 1994; 79(1):72-5. View

5.
Kelly T . Gallstone pancreatitis: pathophysiology. Surgery. 1976; 80(4):488-92. View