» Articles » PMID: 9869724

Success of Repeat ERCP by the Same Endoscopist

Overview
Date 1998 Dec 31
PMID 9869724
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The success rate of repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by the same endoscopist after a failed initial attempt is unknown. It has been suggested that a repeat examination at a tertiary referral center be performed after an unsuccessful attempt. Our aim was to determine the success rate of repeat ERCP at a different endoscopic session by the same endoscopist and the outcomes among patients with a failed index procedure.

Methods: A review of 500 consecutive ERCP procedures was performed at a teaching institution.

Results: The overall initial success rate for cannulation of the duct of interest was 90.8% at index endoscopy. Endoscopy was repeated after 51% unsuccessful procedures, and access to the desired duct was achieved in 87.5% of repeat attempts. A needle knife was used in 21% instances, and its use facilitated cannulation of the duct of interest in 80%. No complications occurred with repeat ERCP. Of the 3 patients who underwent failed repeated ERCP, 1 was not available for the follow-up study, 1 had metastatic cancer, and the other had pancreas divisum. The outcomes among patients who did not undergo repeat ERCP included malignant disease diagnosed with other imaging techniques (35% of patients) and no further admissions or emergency room visits for suspected pancreaticobiliary symptoms (39% of patients).

Conclusions: Repeat ERCP by the same endoscopist yields an 87.5% success rate. This leads to an overall success rate of 95%.

Citing Articles

Pre-Cut Papillotomy Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Rendezvous for Difficult Biliary Cannulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Iqbal A, Ahmad Z, Aziz M, Alharbi A, Ali H, Al-Chalabi A Gastroenterology Res. 2024; 17(4):151-158.

PMID: 39247709 PMC: 11379043. DOI: 10.14740/gr1738.


ERCP PERFORMANCE IN A TERTIARY BRAZILIAN CENTER: FOCUS ON NEW RISK FACTORS, COMPLICATIONS AND QUALITY INDICATORS.

Borges A, de Almeida P, Furlani S, Cury M, Pleskow D Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018; 31(1):e1348.

PMID: 29947682 PMC: 6049994. DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1348.


Is Textbook Outcome a valuable composite measure for short-term outcomes of gastrointestinal treatments in the Netherlands using hospital information system data? .

Salet N, Bremmer R, Verhagen M, Ekkelenkamp V, Hansen B, de Jonge P BMJ Open. 2018; 8(2):e019405.

PMID: 29496668 PMC: 5855341. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019405.


A Multidisciplinary Approach to Pancreas Cancer in 2016: A Review.

Fogel E, Shahda S, Sandrasegaran K, DeWitt J, Easler J, Agarwal D Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112(4):537-554.

PMID: 28139655 PMC: 5659272. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.610.


Association of procedure length on outcomes and adverse events of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Mehta P, Sanaka M, Parsi M, Albeldawi M, Dumot J, Lopez R Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014; 2(2):140-4.

PMID: 24759343 PMC: 4020131. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gou009.