Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Gaucher's Disease: the Early Canadian Experience

Background: The management of severe Gaucher's disease was dramatically improved by the development of enzyme replacement therapy. However, this treatment is very costly (currently about $21,000 per infusion for adults at the starting dose recommended by the manufacturer). The goal of this study was to determine how enzyme replacement therapy was being prescribed and financially supported in various parts of Canada. In addition, demographic and outcome information was elicited.

Methods: Prescribing physicians were identified through professional associations and with the help of the manufacturer of the enzyme preparations used for the treatment of Gaucher's disease. The physicians were surveyed by questionnaire in July 1995. The study included all patients in Canada who had received enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease before July 1, 1995.

Results: A total of 25 patients (15 children and 10 adults) with type 1 Gaucher's disease, the common nonneuronopathic variant of the disease, were receiving enzyme replacement therapy by the end of 1995. The indications for treatment included massive splenomegaly, growth failure, and severe bony, hematologic and pulmonary complications of the disease; no patients with mild disease were receiving treatment. Treatment regimens varied markedly (from 12 to 160 units of enzyme/kg per month). All the patients were reported to have responded well to therapy, based on serial measurements of hematologic indices, liver and spleen volumes, and numbers of bony crises as well as patients' subjective impressions. Financial support for therapy varied markedly from one province to another. None of the reporting physicians was aware of any patients with severe Gaucher's disease who were denied therapy as a result of inability to pay for the medication. Various agencies provided financial support for therapy, including both federal and provincial governments, private insurance carriers and the commercial supplier of the enzyme. In Ontario provincial health care officials accepted the development, by a multidisciplinary panel of medical experts, of formal guidelines for determining eligibility, on the basis of objective medical criteria, for reimbursement for enzyme replacement treatment.

Interpretation: Although some differences were found across the country with respect to the details of treatment, the indications for enzyme replacement therapy and the selection of severely affected patients were similar in the various provinces. However, financial support was inconsistent and varied among provinces and patients. This will prove to be a challenge in future, not only with respect to this disease but also for other diseases for which effective, expensive therapy has been developed.