» Articles » PMID: 9848423

Outcome in General Medical Patients Presenting with Common Symptoms: a Prospective Study with a 2-week and a 3-month Follow-up

Overview
Journal Fam Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1998 Dec 16
PMID 9848423
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although physical complaints account for over half of all ambulatory visits, surprisingly little is known about their natural history and factors affecting prognosis.

Objectives: Our aims were to determine the outcome in general medical patients presenting with physical complaints and to delineate which factors impact upon recovery rates.

Methods: In this cohort study, 500 adults presenting to a general medicine clinic with a chief complaint of a physical symptom were interviewed in order to determine symptom characteristics, the presence of depressive or anxiety disorders, and expectations regarding the visit. Outcomes were assessed immediately post-visit and at 2 weeks and 3 months. The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement, and secondary outcomes included functional status, unmet expectations, satisfaction with care and visit costs.

Results: The majority (70%) of patients improved by 2 weeks follow-up and, of those who had not, 60% got better within 3 months. Moreover, relapse in patients initially better at 2 weeks was uncommon (6%) in the ensuing several months. While symptoms of recent onset had the highest improvement rates, half of those patients whose symptom had been present a year or longer also improved within 2 weeks. Improvement rates varied somewhat by symptom type, but no specific symptom had an improvement rate of less than 50%. Patients who had not improved at 2 weeks were more likely to report continuing serious illness worry, unmet expectations, functional impairment and dissatisfaction, even 3 months after the initial visit.

Conclusion: Most general medical patients with physical complaints improve within 2 weeks of their initial clinic visit. Further attention may best be focused on the minority of patients who fail to improve and experience continuing concerns and impairment.

Citing Articles

Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Scan versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Emergency Department for the Evaluation of Dizziness: A Systematic Review.

Ashiq I, Khan S, Yousaf A Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024; 34(3):488-495.

PMID: 38912244 PMC: 11188715. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1778726.


Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome.

Gottlieb M, Peksa G, Carlson J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 11:CD015089.

PMID: 37916744 PMC: 10620998. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015089.pub2.


Effectiveness of a blended multidisciplinary intervention for patients with moderate medically unexplained physical symptoms (PARASOL): A cluster randomized clinical trial.

van Westrienen P, de Wit N, Toonders S, Veenhof C, Gerrits M, Pisters M PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283162.

PMID: 37023095 PMC: 10079131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283162.


Communication of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Primary Care and Its Impact on Patient Experience: an Integrative Systematic Review.

Dahm M, Cattanach W, Williams M, Basseal J, Gleason K, Crock C J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 38(3):738-754.

PMID: 36127538 PMC: 9971421. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07768-y.


Patients' Perspectives on the Usability of a Blended Approach to an Integrated Intervention for Patients With Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms: Mixed Methods Study.

Toonders S, van Westrienen P, Konings S, Nieboer M, Veenhof C, Pisters M J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(9):e19794.

PMID: 34581674 PMC: 8512187. DOI: 10.2196/19794.