Breast Cancer Screening Programmes in 22 Countries: Current Policies, Administration and Guidelines. International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot Projects for Breast Cancer Screening
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Currently there are at least 22 countries worldwide where national, regional or pilot population-based breast cancer screening programmes have been established. A collaborative effort has been undertaken by the International Breast Cancer Screening Network (IBSN), an international voluntary collaborative effort administered from the National Cancer Institute in the US for the purposes of producing international data on the policies, funding and administration, and results of population-based breast cancer screening.
Methods: Two surveys conducted by the IBSN in 1990 and 1995 describe the status of population-based breast cancer screening in countries which had or planned to establish breast cancer screening programmes in their countries. The 1990 survey was sent to ten countries in the IBSN and was completed by nine countries. The 1995 survey was sent to and completed by the 13 countries in the organization at that time and an additional nine countries in the European Network.
Results: The programmes vary in how they have been organized and have changed from 1990 to 1995. The most notable change is the increase in the number of countries that have established or plan to establish organized breast cancer screening programmes. A second major change is in guidelines for the lower age limit for mammography screening and the use of the clinical breast examination and breast self-examination as additional detection methods.
Conclusion: As high quality population-based breast cancer screening programmes are implemented in more countries, they will offer an unprecedented opportunity to assess the level of coverage of the population for initial and repeat screening, evaluation of performance, and, in the longer term, outcome of screening in terms of reduction in the incidence of late-stage disease and in mortality.
Schmitz R, van den Belt-Dusebout A, Clements K, Ren Y, Cresta C, Timbres J BMJ. 2023; 383:e076022.
PMID: 37903527 PMC: 10614034. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076022.
Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial.
Schmitz R, Engelhardt E, Gerritsma M, Sondermeijer C, Verschuur E, Houtzager J Eur J Cancer. 2023; 192:113276.
PMID: 37657228 PMC: 10632767. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276.
Leveraging Multi-Task Learning to Cope With Poor and Missing Labels of Mammograms.
Tardy M, Mateus D Front Radiol. 2023; 1:796078.
PMID: 37492176 PMC: 10365086. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2021.796078.
Han H, Chu Y, Wang J, Lai Y, Tseng L, Huang C BMC Womens Health. 2023; 23(1):330.
PMID: 37344800 PMC: 10286479. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02445-6.
Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review.
Hussain S, Mubeen I, Ullah N, Shah S, Khan B, Zahoor M Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022:5164970.
PMID: 35707373 PMC: 9192206. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5164970.