» Articles » PMID: 9834415

A Hospital's Annual Rate of Esophagectomy Influences the Operative Mortality Rate

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1998 Dec 3
PMID 9834415
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reported operative mortality rate for esophagectomy for malignancy ranges from 2% to 30%. The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between a hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and the clinical outcome of the operation. Discharge abstracts of 1561 patients who had undergone esophagectomy for malignancy at acute care hospitals in California from 1990 through 1994 were obtained from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. The hospitals were grouped according to the number of esophagectomies performed during the 5-year period, and a mortality rate was calculated for each group. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between a hospital's rate of esophagectomy and the mortality rate. Esophageal resections were performed in 273 hospitals. An average of two or fewer resections were performed annually in 88% of hospitals, which accounted for 50% of all patients treated. The mortality rate in hospitals with more than 30 esophagectomies for the 5-year period was 4.8%, compared with 16% for hospitals with fewer than 30 esophagectomies. This could not be accounted for by other health variables affecting the patients' risk for surgery. There was a striking correlation between a hospital's frequency of esophagectomy and the outcome of this operation. The results support the proposition that high-risk general surgical procedures, such as esophagectomy for malignancy, should be restricted to hospitals that can exceed a yearly minimum experience.

Citing Articles

Hospital volume-mortality association after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Di J, Lu X, Sun M, Zhao Z, Zhang C Int J Surg. 2024; 110(5):3021-3029.

PMID: 38353697 PMC: 11093504. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001185.


Surgeon and Facility Volume are Associated With Postoperative Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Brodeur P, Kim K, Modest J, Cohen E, Gil J, Cruz Jr A Arthroplast Today. 2022; 14:223-230.e1.

PMID: 35510066 PMC: 9059075. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.017.


Effect of hospital volume on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mufarrih S, Ghani M, Martins R, Qureshi N, Mufarrih S, Malik A J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1):468.

PMID: 31881918 PMC: 6935169. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1531-0.


Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: What Is the Value of Treating at High-volume Centers?.

Lazarides A, Kerr D, Nussbaum D, Kreulen R, Somarelli J, Blazer 3rd D Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 477(4):718-727.

PMID: 30485258 PMC: 6437385. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533623.60399.1b.


Can postoperative process of care utilization or complication rates explain the volume-cost relationship for cancer surgery?.

Ho V, Short M, Aloia T Surgery. 2017; 162(2):418-428.

PMID: 28438333 PMC: 6748327. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.004.


References
1.
Laffel G, Barnett A, Finkelstein S, KAYE M . The relation between experience and outcome in heart transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327(17):1220-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199210223271707. View

2.
Nishi M, Hiramatsu Y, Hioki K, Kojima Y, Sanada T, Yamanaka H . Risk factors in relation to postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy or gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 1988; 207(2):148-54. PMC: 1493370. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198802000-00006. View

3.
ELLIS Jr F . Treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus or cardia. Mayo Clin Proc. 1989; 64(8):945-55. DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61222-1. View

4.
Law S, Fok M, Wong J . Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Surg. 1994; 18(3):339-46. DOI: 10.1007/BF00316812. View

5.
Patti M, Wiener-Kronish J, Way L, Pellegrini C . Impact of transhiatal esophagectomy on cardiac and respiratory function. Am J Surg. 1991; 162(6):563-6; discussion 566-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90109-q. View