A Psychiatric Defense of Aid in Dying
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
In November 1997, the voters of Oregon resoundingly affirmed the Oregon Death With Dignity Act. This law allows competent, terminally ill persons who are suffering in the final 6 months of life to obtain a lethal prescription from a physician. This paper presents a psychiatric defense of the Death With Dignity Act including the role of mental health professionals in evaluating competence in compliance with the law. Ethical, logistical, and political issues related to aid-in-dying are reviewed and a strategy for assessing competence is offered.
References
1.
Quill T, Lo B, Brock D
. Palliative options of last resort: a comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia. JAMA. 1997; 278(23):2099-104.
DOI: 10.1001/jama.278.23.2099.
View
2.
Preston T
. Professional norms and physician attitudes toward euthanasia. J Law Med Ethics. 1994; 22(1):36-40.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1994.tb01273.x.
View
3.
Graber M, Levy B, Weir R, Oppliger R
. Patients' views about physician participation in assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Gen Intern Med. 1996; 11(2):71-6.
DOI: 10.1007/BF02599581.
View
4.
van der Maas P, van Delden J, Pijnenborg L, Looman C
. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet. 1991; 338(8768):669-74.
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91241-l.
View
5.
Ganzini L, Fenn D, Lee M, Heintz R, Bloom J
. Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide. Am J Psychiatry. 1996; 153(11):1469-75.
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.153.11.1469.
View