» Articles » PMID: 9817399

Minilaparotomy Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Technique and Results

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 1998 Nov 17
PMID 9817399
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: A small incision (minilaparotomy) radical retropubic prostatectomy is described and evaluated. A newly designed self-retaining retractor was used as a robot and functioned as a second operative assistant.

Materials And Methods: A total of 522 consecutive patients underwent minilaparotomy radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon (F. F. M.) between 1991 and 1997. The technique of minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy (a 7 to 8 cm. midline incision) is described in detail.

Results: A questionnaire was mailed to all 522 patients and there were 265 responses. Satisfactory continence was achieved in the short term in 85% of patients (0 to 1 pad). Of the patients 83% had a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng./ml. at average followup of 2.6 years. There was no operative mortality and the overall complication rates were similar to other patients treated by the same department staff with a larger incision. The typical patient was discharged home 3 days postoperatively.

Conclusions: Minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy compares favorably with standard radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Citing Articles

Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes at single institution.

Fujita N, Koie T, Hashimoto Y, Narita T, Tobisawa Y, Tanaka T Int Urol Nephrol. 2018; 50(11):1999-2005.

PMID: 30229466 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1985-8.


Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of the Surgical Outcomes in a Single Regional Center.

Luciani L, Mattevi D, Mantovani W, Cai T, Chiodini S, Vattovani V Curr Urol. 2018; 11(1):36-41.

PMID: 29463975 PMC: 5814781. DOI: 10.1159/000447192.


Impact of cosmetic result on selection of surgical treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Egui Rojo M, Martinez-Salamanca J, Alvarez Maestro M, Galarza I, Carballido Rodriguez J JSLS. 2014; 18(4).

PMID: 25516703 PMC: 4266226. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00024.


Prospective randomized comparison of the safety, efficacy, and cosmetic outcome associated with mini-transverse and mini-longitudinal radical prostatectomy incisions.

Kava B, Ayyathurai R, Soloway C, Suarez M, Kanagarajah P, Murugesan M Indian J Urol. 2010; 26(3):345-9.

PMID: 21116351 PMC: 2978431. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.70563.


New techniques and management options for localized prostate cancer.

Speight J, Roach M Rev Urol. 2006; 8 Suppl 2:S22-9.

PMID: 17021638 PMC: 1578718.