» Articles » PMID: 9807977

Fentanyl Delivery from an Electrotransport System: Delivery is a Function of Total Current, Not Duration of Current

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1998 Nov 10
PMID 9807977
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This open-label, parallel study of 28 men was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of fentanyl delivered by the E-TRANS (fentanyl) electrotransport transdermal system (ALZA Corporation, Palo Alto, CA). The E-TRANS (fentanyl) system provided electrically assisted, transdermal, continuous delivery of fentanyl. Treatments consisted of no current (group A); a constant current of 100 microA for 26 hours plus 4 additional doses at varying currents for varying times during hour 25 (groups B, C, D); a constant current of 100 microA for 26 hours plus 4 additional doses at 1,200 microA over 2.5 minutes during hour 1 (group E); or 500 microA for 0.5 hours and 100 microA for 3.5 hours (group F). No fentanyl was detected in serum when no current had been applied. Mean serum fentanyl concentrations were similar regardless of current duration during hour 25 (treatments B, C, D). Increases in mean serum fentanyl concentrations were significantly lower during additional dosing for treatment E compared with treatments B, C, and D. Serum fentanyl concentrations sufficient for analgesia (1-3 ng/mL) were attained in treatments using the E-TRANS (fentanyl) system with basal current of 100 microA for 26 hours. There were no safety issues after treatment with E-TRANS (fentanyl) system with concurrent opioid antagonist (naltrexone) administration. The only adverse event requiring treatment was a headache (n = 1). The majority of subjects had no or barely perceptible erythema at the application site 24 hours after system removal. Application of E-TRANS (fentanyl) resulted in therapeutically significant serum fentanyl concentrations over a range of applied currents. Overall serum fentanyl concentrations were higher when the skin had been primed by constant-current fentanyl delivery.

Citing Articles

Patient considerations in the use of transdermal iontophoretic fentanyl for acute postoperative pain.

Hartrick C, Pestano C, Ding L, Danesi H, Jones J J Pain Res. 2016; 9:215-22.

PMID: 27186073 PMC: 4847597. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S89278.


Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery.

Kim Y, Park J, Prausnitz M Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64(14):1547-68.

PMID: 22575858 PMC: 3419303. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005.


Challenges and opportunities in dermal/transdermal delivery.

Paudel K, Milewski M, Swadley C, Brogden N, Ghosh P, Stinchcomb A Ther Deliv. 2010; 1(1):109-31.

PMID: 21132122 PMC: 2995530. DOI: 10.4155/tde.10.16.


Acute postoperative pain management: focus on iontophoretic transdermal fentanyl.

Mattia C, Coluzzi F Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008; 3(1):19-27.

PMID: 18360612 PMC: 1936285. DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.19.


Effects of application site and subject demographics on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).

Gupta S, Hwang S, Southam M, Sathyan G Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44 Suppl 1:25-32.

PMID: 16156113 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544001-00005.