Bioethics for Clinicians: 16. Dealing with Demands for Inappropriate Treatment

Overview

Journal CMAJ

Date 1998 Nov 7

PMID 9805031

Citations 6

Authors

C Weijer

P A Singer

B M Dickens

S Workman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Demands by Patients or their Families for treatment thought to be inappropriate by health care providers constitute an important set of moral problems in clinical practice. A variety of approaches to such cases have been described in the literature, including medical futility, standard of care and negotiation. Medical futility fails because it confounds morally distinct cases: demand for an ineffective treatment and demand for an effective treatment that supports a controversial end (e.g., permanent unconsciousness). Medical futility is not necessary in the first case and is harmful in the second. Ineffective treatment falls outside the standard of care, and thus health care workers have no obligation to provide it. Demands for treatment that supports controversial ends are difficult cases best addressed through open communication, negotiation and the use of conflict-resolution techniques. Institutions should ensure that fair and unambiguous procedures for dealing with such cases are laid out in policy statements.

Citing Articles

Ethics and the 2018 Practice Guideline on Disorders of Consciousness: A Framework for Responsible Implementation.

Peterson A, Young M, Fins J Neurology. 2022; 98(17):712-718.

PMID: 35277446 PMC: 9071367. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200301.

Conceptualization of Idle (Laghw) and its relation to medical futility.

Aderyani M, Javadi M, Nazari Tavakkoli S, Kiani M, Abbasi M J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016; 9:1.

PMID: 27390616 PMC: 4935787.

Identifying critically ill patients with acute kidney injury for whom renal replacement therapy is inappropriate: an exercise in futility?.

Gabbay E, Meyer K NDT Plus. 2015; 2(2):97-103.

PMID: 25949304 PMC: 4421337. DOI: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn196.

Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units.

Anstey M, Adams J, McGlynn E Crit Care. 2015; 19:51.

PMID: 25887104 PMC: 4344807. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0777-0.

Ethics roundtable debate: patients and surrogates want 'everything done'--what does 'everything' mean?.

Doig C, Murray H, Bellomo R, Kuiper M, Costa R, Azoulay E Crit Care. 2006; 10(5):231.

PMID: 17020595 PMC: 1751064. DOI: 10.1186/cc5016.

References

Prendergast T, Luce J . Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997; 155(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.155.1.9001282. View

SCHULTZ S, Cullinane D, Pasquale M, MAGNANT C, Evans S . Predicting in-hospital mortality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1996; 33(1):13-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)00986-0. View

Wood G, Martin E . Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(3):186-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF03010673. View

Weijer C . Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients in a persistent vegetative state: futile or acceptable?. CMAJ. 1998; 158(4):491-3. PMC: 1228923. View

Weijer C, Elliott C . Pulling the plug on futility. BMJ. 1995; 310(6981):683-4. PMC: 2549090. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.683. View

Halevy A, Brody B . A multi-institution collaborative policy on medical futility. JAMA. 1996; 276(7):571-4. View

Daar J . Medical futility and implications for physician autonomy. Am J Law Med. 1995; 21(2-3):221-40. View

Corley M . Moral distress of critical care nurses. Am J Crit Care. 1995; 4(4):280-5. View

Post S . Baby K: medical futility and the free exercise of religion. J Law Med Ethics. 1995; 23(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1995.tb01326.x. View

10.

Simmonds A . Decision-making by default: experiences of physicians and nurses with dying patients in intensive care. Hum Health Care Int. 1996; 12(4):168-72. View

11.

Bedell S, Delbanco T, Cook E, EPSTEIN F . Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med. 1983; 309(10):569-76. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198309083091001. View

12.

Brett A, Mccullough L . When patients request specific interventions: Defining the limits of the physician's obligation. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315(21):1347-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198611203152109. View

13.

Freedman B . Nonvalidated therapies and HIV disease. McGill/Boston Research Group. Hastings Cent Rep. 1989; 19(3):14-20. View

14.

Schneiderman L, Jecker N, Jonsen A . Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990; 112(12):949-54. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-949. View

15.

Angell M . The case of Helga Wanglie. A new kind of "right to die" case. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(7):511-2. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250712. View

16.

Capron A . In re Helga Wanglie. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991; 21(5):26-8. View

17.

Truog R, Brett A, Frader J . The problem with futility. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326(23):1560-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199206043262310. View

18.

Solomon M . How physicians talk about futility: making words mean too many things. J Law Med Ethics. 1993; 21(2):231-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1993.tb01245.x. View

19.

Annas G . Asking the courts to set the standard of emergency care--the case of Baby K. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330(21):1542-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199405263302120. View

20.

Warner S, Sharma T . Outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and predictors of resuscitation status in an urban community teaching hospital. Resuscitation. 1994; 27(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90016-7. View