» Articles » PMID: 9795870

Cost-benefit Analysis of a National Thalassaemia Prevention Programme in Israel

Overview
Journal J Med Screen
Specialty Public Health
Date 1998 Oct 31
PMID 9795870
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: In Israel (population 5.7 million) there are around 200 known living subjects with thalassaemia major, of whom around 80% are from the northern district. This study aims at examining the costs and benefits of a national screening programme to prevent thalassaemia in Israel.

Measurements And Main Results: The lifetime healthcare costs of caring for a person born with thalassaemia major are $284,154. The costs of the home infusion service (33.1%) actually exceed the costs of the chelating agent itself (22.1%). The remaining 44.8% of costs are due to stay in hospital, operations, outpatient visits, laboratory tests, therapists, etc. Lost earnings and premature mortality costs account for a further $51,843 and $141,944 respectively for each case. A national screening programme would cost $900,197 and prevent around 13.4 homozygotes being born, at a cost of $67,369 for each birth prevented. The benefit-cost ratio of the programme to the health services is 4.22:1, which increases to 6.01:1 when a societal perspective is taken. However, around 13.0 homozygote births are still expected to occur, the majority owing to lack of compliance of patients at various stages in the screening process. The addition of a national health education programme for the higher risk non-Jewish population either nationally or in selected regions will incur extra costs, which may be covered by increased benefits as a result of better compliance with the screening programme.

Conclusion: Israel should start to provide a nationwide thalassaemia screening programme as the monetary benefits to society (and even to the health services alone) will exceed the screening programmes costs.

Citing Articles

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand.

Malasai K, Jittikoon J, Udomsinprasert W, Talungchit P, Youngkong S, Sangroongruangsri S Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025; 17:33-43.

PMID: 39931251 PMC: 11808050. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S500802.


Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions.

Nagi M, Rezq M, Sangroongruangsri S, Thavorncharoensap M, Dewi P Glob Health Res Policy. 2022; 7(1):25.

PMID: 35879742 PMC: 9309606. DOI: 10.1186/s41256-022-00258-y.


Global Globin Network Consensus Paper: Classification and Stratified Roadmaps for Improved Thalassaemia Care and Prevention in 32 Countries.

Halim-Fikri B, Lederer C, Baig A, Mat-Ghani S, Syed-Hassan S, Yusof W J Pers Med. 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35455667 PMC: 9032232. DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040552.


NGS-based expanded carrier screening for genetic disorders in North Indian population reveals unexpected results - a pilot study.

Singh K, Bijarnia-Mahay S, Ramprasad V, Puri R, Nair S, Sharda S BMC Med Genet. 2020; 21(1):216.

PMID: 33138774 PMC: 7607710. DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01153-4.


A cost-of-illness analysis of β-Thalassaemia major in children in Sri Lanka - experience from a tertiary level teaching hospital.

Reed-Embleton H, Arambepola S, Dixon S, Nezafat Maldonado B, Premawardhena A, Arambepola M BMC Pediatr. 2020; 20(1):257.

PMID: 32460774 PMC: 7251920. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02160-3.