» Articles » PMID: 9794496

Proliferation Indices As Molecular Pharmacodynamic Endpoints in Evaluation of Anticancer Drug Effect in Human Solid Tumors

Overview
Journal Pharm Res
Specialties Pharmacology
Pharmacy
Date 1998 Oct 30
PMID 9794496
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The present study compared proliferative indices, i.e. incorporation of DNA precursor (i.e. thymidine or TdR, and bromodeoxyuridine or BrdU) and expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), as molecular pharmacodynamic endpoints in evaluation of anticancer drug effect in human solid tumors.

Methods: Tumor specimens obtained from patients were grown as histocultures. After treatment with doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and/or paclitaxel, cells labeled by [3H]TdR were identified using autoradiography, and cells labeled by BrdU and PCNA were identified using immunohistochemical techniques. Drug effect was measured as reduction of DNA precursor-labeled cells or PCNA-expressing cells.

Results: The results indicate that (a) the two DNA precursors, TdR and BrdU, labeled the same cells and resulted in identical pharmacodynamics, (b) the pharmacodynamics established using inhibition of DNA precursor incorporation were qualitatively and quantitatively different from the pharmacodynamics established using inhibition of PCNA expression, (c) the inhibition of PCNA expression was erratic in some tumors, and (d) the differences in pharmacodynamics established using the two end points are drug-specific, with greater differences for paclitaxel than for mitomycin C.

Conclusions: The erratic results measured by the PCNA labeling method suggest that this method may be less reliable than the conventional DNA precursor labeling method. The finding of identical pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin and paclitaxel established using BrdU and [3H]TdR indicates that the two precursors are interchangeable. Because the methodology for detecting BrdU incorporation requires less time and does not require the use of radioactivity, we conclude that inhibition of BrdU incorporation represents a useful endpoint for evaluating the antiproliferative activity of anticancer drugs in human solid tumors.

References
1.
Gan Y, Wientjes M, Schuller D, Au J . Pharmacodynamics of taxol in human head and neck tumors. Cancer Res. 1996; 56(9):2086-93. View

2.
Yonemura Y, Kamata T, Ohoyama S, Matumoto H, Kimura H, Kosaka T . Relation of proliferative activity to survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Anal Cell Pathol. 1991; 3(2):103-10. View

3.
Weidner N, Moore 2nd D, Ljung B, Waldman F, Goodson 3rd W, Mayall B . Correlation of bromodeoxyuridine (BRDU) labeling of breast carcinoma cells with mitotic figure content and tumor grade. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993; 17(10):987-94. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-199310000-00003. View

4.
Soames A, Lavender D, Foster J, Williams S, Wheeldon E . Image analysis of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) staining for measurement of S-phase in rat and mouse liver. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994; 42(7):939-44. DOI: 10.1177/42.7.8014477. View

5.
Schmittgen T, Weaver J, Badalament R, Wientjes M, Klein E, Young D . Correlation of human bladder tumor histoculture proliferation and sensitivity to mitomycin C with tumor pathobiology. J Urol. 1994; 152(5 Pt 1):1632-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32493-x. View