» Articles » PMID: 9774576

Rapid Identification of Candida Species with Species-specific DNA Probes

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1998 Oct 17
PMID 9774576
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid identification of Candida species has become more important because of an increase in infections caused by species other than Candida albicans, including species innately resistant to azole antifungal drugs. We previously developed a PCR assay with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) format to detect amplicons from the five most common Candida species by using universal fungal primers and species-specific probes directed to the ITS2 region of the gene for rRNA. We designed probes to detect seven additional Candida species (C. guilliermondii, C. kefyr, C. lambica, C. lusitaniae, C. pelliculosa, C. rugosa, and C. zeylanoides) included in the API 20C sugar assimilation panel, five probes for species not identified by API 20C (C. haemulonii, C. norvegica, C. norvegensis, C. utilis, and C. viswanathii), and a probe for the newly described species C. dubliniensis, creating a panel of 18 Candida species probes. The PCR-EIA correctly identified multiple strains of each species tested, including five identified as C. albicans by the currently available API 20C database but determined to be C. dubliniensis by genotypic and nonroutine phenotypic characteristics. Species identification time was reduced from a mean of 3.5 days by conventional identification methods to 7 h by the PCR-EIA. This method is simple, rapid, and feasible for identifying Candida species in clinical laboratories that utilize molecular identification techniques and provides a novel method to differentiate the new species, C. dubliniensis, from C. albicans.

Citing Articles

: Biology, Pathogenicity, Virulence Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Mendoza-Reyes D, Gomez-Gaviria M, Mora-Montes H Infect Drug Resist. 2022; 15:5121-5135.

PMID: 36068831 PMC: 9441179. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S383785.


Comparison of CHROMagar, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and polymerase chain reaction-fragment size for the identification of Candida species.

Jafari Z, Motamedi M, Jalalizand N, Shokoohi G, Charsizadeh A, Mirhendi H Curr Med Mycol. 2018; 3(3):10-15.

PMID: 29707668 PMC: 5914921. DOI: 10.29252/cmm.3.3.10.


The Role of PCR in the Diagnosis of Candida Vulvovaginitis-a New Gold Standard?.

Sobel J, Akins R Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2015; 17(6):488.

PMID: 26003471 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-015-0488-3.


Multi-probe real-time PCR identification of four common Candida species in blood culture broth.

Foongladda S, Mongkol N, Petlum P, Chayakulkeeree M Mycopathologia. 2014; 177(5-6):251-61.

PMID: 24740169 DOI: 10.1007/s11046-014-9743-7.


Candida identification: a journey from conventional to molecular methods in medical mycology.

Alam M, Alam Q, Jiman-Fatani A, Kamal M, Abuzenadah A, Chaudhary A World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 30(5):1437-51.

PMID: 24379160 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-013-1574-z.


References
1.
Sobel J, Vazquez J, Lynch M, Meriwether C, Zervos M . Vaginitis due to Saccharomyces cerevisiae: epidemiology, clinical aspects, and therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 16(1):93-9. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/16.1.93. View

2.
Kwok S, Higuchi R . Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature. 1989; 339(6221):237-8. DOI: 10.1038/339237a0. View

3.
Lott T, Kuykendall R, Reiss E . Nucleotide sequence analysis of the 5.8S rDNA and adjacent ITS2 region of Candida albicans and related species. Yeast. 1993; 9(11):1199-206. DOI: 10.1002/yea.320091106. View

4.
Rex J, Pfaller M, Barry A, Nelson P, Webb C . Antifungal susceptibility testing of isolates from a randomized, multicenter trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B as treatment of nonneutropenic patients with candidemia. NIAID Mycoses Study Group and the Candidemia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995; 39(1):40-4. PMC: 162481. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.1.40. View

5.
Wingard J . Importance of Candida species other than C. albicans as pathogens in oncology patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1995; 20(1):115-25. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/20.1.115. View