» Articles » PMID: 9771385

A Comparison of Patient Dose for Examinations of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract at 11 Conventional and Digital X-ray Units in The Netherlands

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 1998 Oct 15
PMID 9771385
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to derive the effective dose to patients from examinations of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract at 11 X-ray units in 10 Dutch hospitals. Entrance dose and entrance dose rate were measured at the surface of a homogeneous PMMA phantom and at the entrance surface of the image intensifier. Dose-area products (DAPs) were assessed during examinations of patients. The patients (334 females and 256 males) ages were 18-95 years (average 52 years). Effective dose was assessed from DAP using Monte Carlo computer calculations for male and female mathematical anthropomorphic phantoms. The DAPs measured during the survey showed substantial variations, i.e. an overall average value of 21 Gy cm2 and a range of average DAP per X-ray unit varying from 7 to 56 Gy cm2. Variations in the number of images (8-28) and the fluoroscopy time (1.7 min-7.0 min) were also large. A DAP to effective dose conversion factor of 0.32 mSv Gy cm-2 was derived for upper GI studies. The dose survey yielded an overall average effective dose of 6.7 mSv. At one location an examination involving as many as 28 projections was performed, whilst maintaining a DAP well below 15 Gy cm2 and an effective dose below 6 mSv. This was achieved using modern equipment (i.e. high frequency generator, digital spot films) with 0.2 mm additional copper filtration and a relatively high tube voltage. For examinations of the upper GI tract, the application of a reference value of 30 Gy cm2 for the DAP will ensure that, in general, the effective dose to individual patients will not exceed 15 mSv.

Citing Articles

Effective dose estimation for pediatric upper gastrointestinal examinations using an anthropomorphic phantom set and metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) technology.

Emigh B, Gordon C, Connolly B, Falkiner M, Thomas K Pediatr Radiol. 2013; 43(9):1108-16.

PMID: 23529628 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-013-2674-5.


Cancer risk related to gastrointestinal diagnostic radiation exposure.

Chang M, Hou J Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011; 13(5):449-57.

PMID: 21833692 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-011-0214-8.


Radiation dose evaluations during radiological contrast studies in patients with morbid obesity.

Rampado O, Luberto L, Faletti R, Garelli E, Cassinis M, Ropolo R Radiol Med. 2008; 113(8):1229-40.

PMID: 18956149 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-008-0335-9.


Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals undergoing endoscopy.

Shoda H, Kakugawa Y, Saito D, Kozu T, Terauchi T, Daisaki H Br J Cancer. 2007; 97(11):1493-8.

PMID: 18040274 PMC: 2360260. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604062.


An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications.

Teeuwisse W, Geleijns J, VELDKAMP W Eur Radiol. 2006; 17(7):1795-805.

PMID: 17061067 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0473-1.