» Articles » PMID: 9763094

Clinical Aspects of Vasectomies Performed in the United States in 1995

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 1998 Oct 8
PMID 9763094
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Currently, no surveillance system collects data on the numbers and characteristics of vasectomies performed annually in the United States. This study provides nationwide data on the numbers of vasectomies and the use of no-scalpel vasectomy, various occlusion methods, fascial interposition, and protocols for analyzing semen after vasectomy.

Methods: A retrospective mail survey (with telephone follow-up) was conducted of 1800 urology, family practice, and general surgery practices drawn from the American Medical Association's Physician Master File and stratified by specialty and census region. Mail survey and telephone follow-up yielded an 88% response rate.

Results: In 1995, approximately 494,000 vasectomies are estimated to have been performed by 15,800 physicians in the United States. Urologists performed 76% of all vasectomies, and nearly all (93%) urology practices performed vasectomies in 1995. Nearly one third (29%) of vasectomies in 1995 were no-scalpel vasectomies, and 37% of physicians performing no-scalpel vasectomies taught themselves the procedure. The most common occlusion method in 1995 (used for 38% of all vasectomies) was concurrent use of ligation and cautery. In 1995, slightly less than half (48%) of all physicians surveyed interposed the fascial sheath over one end of the vas when performing a vasectomy. Protocols for ensuring azoospermia varied: 56% of physicians required one postvasectomy semen specimen; 39% required two, and 5%, three or more.

Conclusions: No-scalpel vasectomy, used by nearly one third of U.S. physicians, has become an accepted part of urologic care. Physicians' variations in occlusion methods, use of fascial interposition, and postvasectomy protocols underscore the need for large scale, controlled, and statistically valid studies to determine the efficacy of occlusion methods and fascial interposition, as well as whether azoospermia is the only determination of a successful vasectomy.

Citing Articles

Adherence to american urological association (AUA) vasectomy guidelines: a systematic review of current practice among healthcare providers.

Mahdi M, Hammad M, Abou Chawareb E, Almuhaideb M, Yafi F Int J Impot Res. 2025; .

PMID: 39893250 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-025-01023-8.


UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Vasectomy.

Zini A, Grantmyre J, Chow V, Chan P Can Urol Assoc J. 2022; 16(5):E231-E236.

PMID: 35544354 PMC: 9119596. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7860.


Development of Novel Male Contraceptives.

Amory J Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 13(2):228-237.

PMID: 31618525 PMC: 7070810. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12708.


Vasectomy: tips and tricks.

Johnson D, Sandlow J Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(4):704-709.

PMID: 28904903 PMC: 5583057. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.08.


CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Zini A, Grantmyre J, Chan P Can Urol Assoc J. 2016; 10(7-8):E274-E278.

PMID: 27878054 PMC: 5110415. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4017.