» Articles » PMID: 9736628

An ATP-ADP Switch in MuB Controls Progression of the Mu Transposition Pathway

Overview
Journal EMBO J
Date 1998 Sep 16
PMID 9736628
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

MuB protein, an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein, collaborates with Mu transposase to promote efficient transposition. MuB binds target DNA, delivers this target DNA segment to transposase and activates transposase's catalytic functions. Using ATP-bound, ADP-bound and ATPase-defective MuB proteins we investigated how nucleotide binding and hydrolysis control the activities of MuB protein, important for transposition. We found that both MuB-ADP and MuB-ATP stimulate transposase, whereas only MuB-ATP binds with high affinity to DNA. Four different ATPase-defective MuB mutants fail to activate the normal transposition pathway, further indicating that ATP plays critical regulatory roles during transposition. These mutant proteins fall into two classes: class I mutants are defective in target DNA binding, whereas class II mutants bind target DNA, deliver it to transposase, but fail to promote recombination with this DNA. Based on these studies, we propose that the switch from the ATP- to ADP-bound form allows MuB to release the target DNA while maintaining its stimulatory interaction with transposase. Thus, ATP-hydrolysis by MuB appears to function as a molecular switch controlling how target DNA is delivered to the core transposition machinery.

Citing Articles

Molecular basis for transposase activation by a dedicated AAA+ ATPase.

de la Gandara A, Spinola-Amilibia M, Araujo-Bazan L, Nunez-Ramirez R, Berger J, Arias-Palomo E Nature. 2024; 630(8018):1003-1011.

PMID: 38926614 PMC: 11208146. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07550-6.


Structural basis for target site selection in RNA-guided DNA transposition systems.

Park J, Tsai A, Mehrotra E, Petassi M, Hsieh S, Ke A Science. 2021; 373(6556):768-774.

PMID: 34385391 PMC: 9080059. DOI: 10.1126/science.abi8976.


Transposons to toxins: the provenance, architecture and diversification of a widespread class of eukaryotic effectors.

Zhang D, Burroughs A, Vidal N, Iyer L, Aravind L Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(8):3513-33.

PMID: 27060143 PMC: 4857004. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw221.


Conformational toggling controls target site choice for the heteromeric transposase element Tn7.

Shi Q, Straus M, Caron J, Wang H, Chung Y, Guarne A Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(22):10734-45.

PMID: 26384427 PMC: 4678854. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv913.


MuB is an AAA+ ATPase that forms helical filaments to control target selection for DNA transposition.

Mizuno N, Dramicanin M, Mizuuchi M, Adam J, Wang Y, Han Y Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(27):E2441-50.

PMID: 23776210 PMC: 3703974. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309499110.


References
1.
Welty D, Jones J, Nakai H . Communication of ClpXP protease hypersensitivity to bacteriophage Mu repressor isoforms. J Mol Biol. 1997; 272(1):31-41. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1193. View

2.
Craig N . Target site selection in transposition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1997; 66:437-74. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.437. View

3.
Gradia S, Acharya S, Fishel R . The human mismatch recognition complex hMSH2-hMSH6 functions as a novel molecular switch. Cell. 1998; 91(7):995-1005. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80490-0. View

4.
Millner A, Chaconas G . Disruption of target DNA binding in Mu DNA transposition by alteration of position 99 in the Mu B protein. J Mol Biol. 1998; 275(2):233-43. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1446. View

5.
Walker J, Saraste M, Runswick M, Gay N . Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982; 1(8):945-51. PMC: 553140. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. View