» Articles » PMID: 9721860

Genetic Alterations in Primary Bladder Cancers and Their Metastases

Overview
Journal Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 1998 Aug 29
PMID 9721860
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bladder cancer progression is thought to be associated with sequential genetic events. To search for the specific genetic changes associated with the metastatic process, comparative genomic hybridization was performed on 22 primary tumors and 24 metastases (10 distant and 14 nodal metastases) from 17 patients with stage pT2-4 bladder cancer. There was a striking similarity between the genetic alterations present in the primary and metastatic tumor samples from the same patient. The mean number of genetic changes/tumor was 12.2 for primary tumors and 11.7 for metastases. There was a strong concordance in the specific aberrations present in each patient's primary and metastatic lesions (mean, 75%). Concordance was also high among multiple sites from an individual primary tumor (mean, 96%) and multiple metastases from the same patient (mean, 75%). There were no specific genetic changes overrepresented in the metastases compared with their primary tumors. Genetic alterations present in more than 40% of tumors included gains on 6p, 8q, 10q, and 17q and losses involving 8p, 10q, and Y. Two regions of high-level amplification were common: (a) 10q22.1-q23.1 (32.6%); and (b) 17q11-21.3 (23.9%; the locus of erbB-2). A summary statistic was developed to quantitate the degree of clonal relationships between biopsies from the same patient. These data support a model in which minimal clonal evolution occurs in the metastatic tumor cell population after the metastatic event. When comparing primary cancers from patients with and without metastases, however, several unique genetic changes were identified in those cancers with metastases, suggesting that these loci may harbor genes important to the metastatic process.

Citing Articles

Intra-tumour molecular heterogeneity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma reveals the diversity of the response to targeted therapies using patient-derived xenograft models.

Hong B, Yang Y, Guo S, Duoerkun S, Deng X, Chen D Oncotarget. 2017; 8(30):49839-49850.

PMID: 28548943 PMC: 5564811. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17765.


Tumour and patient factors in renal cell carcinoma-towards personalized therapy.

Haddad A, Margulis V Nat Rev Urol. 2015; 12(5):253-62.

PMID: 25868564 DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.71.


The role of EGFR family inhibitors in muscle invasive bladder cancer: a review of clinical data and molecular evidence.

Mooso B, Vinall R, Mudryj M, Yap S, DeVere White R, Ghosh P J Urol. 2014; 193(1):19-29.

PMID: 25158272 PMC: 4405894. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.121.


Mapping of the chromosomal amplification 1p21-22 in bladder cancer.

Scaravilli M, Asero P, Tammela T, Visakorpi T, Saramaki O BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7:547.

PMID: 25135188 PMC: 4143550. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-547.


Biological resonance for cancer metastasis, a new hypothesis based on comparisons between primary cancers and metastases.

Gao D, Li S Cancer Microenviron. 2013; 6(3):213-30.

PMID: 24214411 PMC: 3855372. DOI: 10.1007/s12307-013-0138-y.