Prospective Multicenter Study of the Quality of Oncologic Resections in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery for Cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer is currently under discussion. Results of large, randomized studies will not be available for a number of years yet. This study analyses the results of such resections in consecutive patients operated on by unselected surgeons.
Methods: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was initiated on August 1, 1995, in the German-speaking countries of Europe. One year after initiation of the study, findings are presented with respect to the quality of oncologic resections.
Results: Of 500 operations, 231 (46 percent) were performed for cancer, 167 (33 percent) with a curative intent. The most common curative resections were as follows: 63 anterior rectum resections (38 percent), 51 sigmoid resections (30 percent), and 27 abdominoperineal resections (16 percent). Segmental resections were performed in 20 patients (12 percent). Intraoperative tumor spillage was reported in 2 percent. Mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 13 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 11.5-14.6) and positive lymph nodes harvested was 2.2 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 0.9-3.4). Significant differences were noted between participating centers in terms of number of lymph nodes resected (P < 0.0001). Distal and proximal resection margins were tumor-free in every case. Lateral margins were tumor free when examined. In the case of 63 curative anterior resections, the mean distal resection margin was 39 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; range, 33-45) mm, and in 8 of these resections, it was less than 20 min. Mean blood loss was 344 (confidence interval, 5-95 percent; 292-396) ml, and 21 percent of patients received blood transfusion.
Conclusions: These data document that the average quality of laparoscopic colorectal procedures for cancer is satisfactory but differs among surgeons.
Bedirli A, Salman B, Yuksel O Minim Invasive Surg. 2014; 2014:530314.
PMID: 25506425 PMC: 4259079. DOI: 10.1155/2014/530314.
Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision.
Sajid M, Ahamd A, Miles W, Baig M World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 6(5):209-19.
PMID: 24891934 PMC: 4024494. DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209.
Prakash K, Kamalesh N, Pramil K, Vipin I, Sylesh A, Jacob M J Minim Access Surg. 2013; 9(3):99-103.
PMID: 24019686 PMC: 3764663. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.115366.
Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.
Murphy J, Young-Fadok T World J Surg. 2013; 37(8):1799-807.
PMID: 23652354 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2071-0.
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.
Agha A, Furst A, Hierl J, Iesalnieks I, Glockzin G, Anthuber M Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(10):2229-37.
PMID: 18622560 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0028-4.