Anti-D Prophylaxis in 1997: the Edinburgh Consensus Statement
Overview
Overview
Journal
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Specialties
Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pediatrics
Pediatrics
Date
1998 Aug 26
PMID
9713023
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Bowman J, Pollock J
. Antenatal prophylaxis of Rh isoimmunization: 28-weeks'-gestation service program. Can Med Assoc J. 1978; 118(6):627-30.
PMC: 1818036.
View
2.
Polesky H, Sebring E
. Evaluation of methods for detection and quantitation of fetal cells and their effect on RhIgG usage. Am J Clin Pathol. 1981; 76(4 Suppl):525-9.
View
3.
Bowman J, Pollock J
. Failures of intravenous Rh immune globulin prophylaxis: an analysis of the reasons for such failures. Transfus Med Rev. 1987; 1(2):101-12.
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-7963(87)70010-8.
View
4.
Hughes R, Craig J, Murphy W, Greer I
. Causes and clinical consequences of Rhesus (D) haemolytic disease of the newborn: a study of a Scottish population, 1985-1990. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101(4):297-300.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13613.x.
View
5.
Hadley A, Kumpel B
. The role of Rh antibodies in haemolytic disease of the newborn. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1993; 6(2):423-44.
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3536(05)80153-2.
View