» Articles » PMID: 9710632

Functional and Physical Interaction Between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the Yeast Checkpoint Pathways

Overview
Journal Mol Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1998 Aug 26
PMID 9710632
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The RFC5 gene encodes a small subunit of replication factor C (RFC) complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and has been shown to be required for the checkpoints which respond to replication block and DNA damage. Here we describe the isolation of RAD24, known to play a role in the DNA damage checkpoint, as a dosage-dependent suppressor of rfc5-1. RAD24 overexpression suppresses the sensitivity of rfc5-1 cells to DNA-damaging agents and the defect in DNA damage-induced Rad53 phosphorylation. Rad24, like Rfc5, is required for the regulation of Rad53 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. The Rad24 protein, which is structurally related to the RFC subunits, interacts physically with RFC subunits Rfc2 and Rfc5 and cosediments with Rfc5. Although the rad24Delta mutation alone does not cause a defect in the replication block checkpoint, it does enhance the defect in rfc5-1 mutants. Furthermore, overexpression of RAD24 suppresses the rfc5-1 defect in the replication block checkpoint. Taken together, our results demonstrate a physical and functional interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the checkpoint pathways.

Citing Articles

DNA Replication and Sister Chromatid Cohesion 1 (DSCC1) of the Replication Factor Complex CTF18-RFC is Critical for Colon Cancer Cell Growth.

Kim J, Cho H, Park S, Oh B, Hwang Y, Baek K J Cancer. 2019; 10(24):6142-6153.

PMID: 31762824 PMC: 6856584. DOI: 10.7150/jca.32339.


Tolerance of DNA Replication Stress Is Promoted by Fumarate Through Modulation of Histone Demethylation and Enhancement of Replicative Intermediate Processing in .

Saatchi F, Kirchmaier A Genetics. 2019; 212(3):631-654.

PMID: 31123043 PMC: 6614904. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302238.


Structural studies of RFC reveal a novel chromatin recruitment role for Dcc1.

Wade B, Liu H, Samora C, Uhlmann F, Singleton M EMBO Rep. 2017; 18(4):558-568.

PMID: 28188145 PMC: 5376975. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201642825.


MTE1 Functions with MPH1 in Double-Strand Break Repair.

Yimit A, Kim T, Anand R, Meister S, Ou J, Haber J Genetics. 2016; 203(1):147-57.

PMID: 26920759 PMC: 4858770. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.185454.


Assembly of Slx4 signaling complexes behind DNA replication forks.

Balint A, Kim T, Gallo D, Cussiol J, Bastos de Oliveira F, Yimit A EMBO J. 2015; 34(16):2182-97.

PMID: 26113155 PMC: 4557669. DOI: 10.15252/embj.201591190.


References
1.
Paulovich A, Toczyski D, Hartwell L . When checkpoints fail. Cell. 1997; 88(3):315-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81870-x. View

2.
Lydall D, Weinert T . G2/M checkpoint genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: further evidence for roles in DNA replication and/or repair. Mol Gen Genet. 1998; 256(6):638-51. DOI: 10.1007/s004380050612. View

3.
Siede W, Friedberg A, Dianova I, Friedberg E . Characterization of G1 checkpoint control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Genetics. 1994; 138(2):271-81. PMC: 1206146. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.271. View

4.
Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L . A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science. 1995; 268(5218):1749-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.7792600. View

5.
Cullmann G, Fien K, Kobayashi R, Stillman B . Characterization of the five replication factor C genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995; 15(9):4661-71. PMC: 230709. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.9.4661. View