Scoring Prevalence and Severity in Gonarthritis: the Suitability of the Kellgren & Lawrence Scale

Overview

Journal Clin Rheumatol

Publisher Springer

Specialty Rheumatology

Date 1998 Aug 7

PMID 9694053

Citations 16

Authors

S Kessler

K P Guenther

W Puhl

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In clinical and epidemiological studies the Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) scale was mainly used in the past to determine the radiological prevalence and severity of gonarthritis. The dependency of this scoring system on the presence of osteophytes has been criticised, and owing to its varying reliability, its appropriateness in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies is questioned. It was the purpose of this study to test whether the dependency of the K&L scale on the presence of osteophytes is reflected in a higher correlation of the overall score with a separate scoring of 'osteophytes' than with other radiological features. Furthermore we compared the inter- and intrarater reliability with the reliability of individual radiological features. Knee radiographs of 40 patients were graded according to the K&L scale and for the presence and severity of five separate radiological features of osteoarthritis. We found a moderate correlation of the K&L scale with the radiological features of 'osteophytes', 'joint space narrowing' and 'flattening of condyles'. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K&L scale was higher than the reliability of the individual radiological features. The K&L scale seems not to be strongly dependent on the presence of osteophytes, i.e. there is not a higher correlation of the overall score with that feature than with other radiological features.

Citing Articles

A novel classifier of radiographic knee osteoarthritis for use on knee DXA images is predictive of joint replacement in UK Biobank.

Beynon R, Saunders F, Ebsim R, Faber B, Jung M, Gregory J Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2025; 9(1):rkaf009.

PMID: 39991690 PMC: 11846665. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaf009.

We may be closer to automated Kellgren-Lawrence grading for knee osteoarthritis than we thought.

Xi Y, Chhabra A Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39297949 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11064-0.

Determination of reference intervals for knee motor functions specific to patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

Ito H, Ichihara K, Tamari K, Amano T, Tanaka S, Uchida S PLoS One. 2021; 16(4):e0249564.

PMID: 33852606 PMC: 8046200. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249564.

Factors characterizing gait performance of patients before and soon after knee arthroplasty.

Ito H, Ichihara K, Tamari K, Amano T, Tanaka S, Uchida S J Phys Ther Sci. 2021; 33(3):274-282.

PMID: 33814716 PMC: 8012181. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.33.274.

Automated Classification of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Using Deep Neural Networks.

Thomas K, Kidzinski L, Halilaj E, Fleming S, Venkataraman G, Oei E Radiol Artif Intell. 2020; 2(2):e190065.

PMID: 32280948 PMC: 7104788. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190065.

References

Satku K, Kumar V, Ngoi S . Anterior cruciate ligament injuries. To counsel or to operate?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986; 68(3):458-61. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B3.3755441. View

Kellgren J, Lawrence J . Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957; 16(4):494-502. PMC: 1006995. DOI: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494. View

Brandt K, Fife R, Braunstein E, Katz B . Radiographic grading of the severity of knee osteoarthritis: relation of the Kellgren and Lawrence grade to a grade based on joint space narrowing, and correlation with arthroscopic evidence of articular cartilage degeneration. Arthritis Rheum. 1991; 34(11):1381-6. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780341106. View

Danielsson L . INCIDENCE AND PROGNOSIS OF COXARTHROSIS. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1964; 66:SUPPL 66:1-114. DOI: 10.3109/ort.1964.35.suppl-66.01. View

Bagge E, Bjelle A, VALKENBURG H, Svanborg A . Prevalence of radiographic osteoarthritis in two elderly European populations. Rheumatol Int. 1992; 12(1):33-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00246874. View

Felson D, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan R . The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987; 30(8):914-8. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780300811. View

Merchant T, Dietz F . Long-term follow-up after fractures of the tibial and fibular shafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(4):599-606. View

McAlindon T, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe P . Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992; 51(7):844-9. PMC: 1004766. DOI: 10.1136/ard.51.7.844. View

Symmons D, van Hemert A, Vandenbroucke J, VALKENBURG H . A longitudinal study of back pain and radiological changes in the lumbar spines of middle aged women. II. Radiographic findings. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991; 50(3):162-6. PMC: 1004366. DOI: 10.1136/ard.50.3.162. View

10.

Wright J, Feinstein A . Improving the reliability of orthopaedic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(2):287-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1544971. View

11.

Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Christensen F, Schmidt S, Pedersen N, Jorgensen B . A new method of estimation of interobserver variation and its application to the radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis in hip joints. Stat Med. 1988; 7(6):639-47. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780070603. View

12.

Lane N, Nevitt M, Genant H, Hochberg M . Reliability of new indices of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hand and hip and lumbar disc degeneration. J Rheumatol. 1993; 20(11):1911-8. View

13.

Thomas R, Resnick D, Alazraki N, Daniel D, Greenfield R . Compartmental evaluation of osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study of available diagnostic modalities. Radiology. 1975; 116(3):585-94. DOI: 10.1148/116.3.585. View

14.

Cooper C, Cushnaghan J, Kirwan J, Dieppe P, Rogers J, McAlindon T . Radiographic assessment of the knee joint in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992; 51(1):80-2. PMC: 1004624. DOI: 10.1136/ard.51.1.80. View

15.

Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K . Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986; 29(8):1039-49. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780290816. View

16.

Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, Scott W . Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):13-4. View

17.

Spector T, Hart D, Byrne J, Harris P, Dacre J, Doyle D . Definition of osteoarthritis of the knee for epidemiological studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993; 52(11):790-4. PMC: 1005190. DOI: 10.1136/ard.52.11.790. View

18.

Kallman D, Wigley F, Scott Jr W, Hochberg M, Tobin J . New radiographic grading scales for osteoarthritis of the hand. Reliability for determining prevalence and progression. Arthritis Rheum. 1989; 32(12):1584-91. DOI: 10.1002/anr.1780321213. View

19.

Scott Jr W, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Reichle R, Wigley F, Tobin J, Hochberg M . Reliability of grading scales for individual radiographic features of osteoarthritis of the knee. The Baltimore longitudinal study of aging atlas of knee osteoarthritis. Invest Radiol. 1993; 28(6):497-501. View

20.

Cooper C, Cook P, Osmond C, Fisher L, Cawley M . Osteoarthritis of the hip and osteoporosis of the proximal femur. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991; 50(8):540-2. PMC: 1004483. DOI: 10.1136/ard.50.8.540. View