» Articles » PMID: 9681118

The Neosexual Revolution

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 1998 Jul 29
PMID 9681118
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The affluent societies of the Western world have witnessed a tremendous cultural and social transformation of sexuality during the 1980s and 1990s, a process I refer to as the neosexual revolution. Up to now, this recoding and reassessment of sexuality has proceeded rather slowly and quietly. Yet both its real and its symbolic effects may indeed be more consequential than those brought about in the course of the rapid, noisy sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. The neosexual revolution is dismantling the old patterns of sexuality and reassembling them anew. In the process, dimensions, intimate relationships, preferences, and sexual fragments emerge, many of which had been submerged, were unnamed, or simply did not exist before. In general, sexuality has lost much of its symbolic meaning as a cultural phenomenon. Sexuality is no longer the great metaphor for pleasure and happiness, nor is it so greatly overestimated as it was during the sexual revolution. It is now widely taken for granted, much like egotism or motility. Whereas sex was once mystified in a positive sense--as ecstasy and transgression, it has now taken on a negative mystification characterized by abuse, violence, and deadly infection. While the old sexuality was based primarily upon sexual instinct, orgasm, and the heterosexual couple, neosexualities revolve predominantly around gender difference, thrills, self-gratification, and prosthetic substitution. From the vast number of interrelated processes from which neosexualities emerge, three empirically observable phenomena have been selected for discussion here: the dissociation of the sexual sphere, the dispersion of sexual fragments, and the diversification of intimate relationships. These processes go hand in hand with the commercialization and banalization of sexuality. They are looked upon as being controlled individually through the mechanisms of a fundamentally egotistical consensus morality. In conformity with the general principles at work in society, the outcome of the neosexual revolution could be described as self-disciplined and self-optimized lean sexuality.

Citing Articles

British mental healthcare responses to adult homosexuality and gender non-conforming children at the turn of the twenty-first century.

Pilgrim D Hist Psychiatry. 2023; 34(4):434-450.

PMID: 37526106 PMC: 10638846. DOI: 10.1177/0957154X231181461.


Critical Overview of Patriarchy, Its Interferences With Psychological Development, and Risks for Mental Health.

Gupta M, Madabushi J, Gupta N Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e40216.

PMID: 37435274 PMC: 10332384. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40216.


Homicide Rates of Transgender Individuals in the United States: 2010-2014.

Dinno A Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(9):1441-1447.

PMID: 28727530 PMC: 5551594. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303878.


On cultural transformations of sexuality and gender in recent decades.

Sigusch V Ger Med Sci. 2009; 2:Doc07.

PMID: 19675690 PMC: 2703209.


[Zoophilia between pathology and normality. Presentation of 3 case reports and an internet survey].

Dittert S, Seidl O, Soyka M Nervenarzt. 2004; 76(1):61-7.

PMID: 15197450 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-004-1693-8.